Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wonk who wrote (520)	6/4/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: LIQPLMBER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

Mr Wonk, I really dont understand how a stock is valued, and to be honest with you, dont understand the stock market that much. But if there are around 150 million engines built each year and lets say that aeng gets only 20% of the market. thats 30 million motors that year and lets say it gets an average of 50.00$ per engine. That would be about 1.5 billion dallars in revenues that year. The overhead would be a bunch of accountants and a building with offices for them. Lets say that the overhead was 5 million a year for example. That still leaves 1,495,000,000.00 of profit. Of course we must pay taxes. I look at some of the big companies with stock values of 80 per share to 120 per share and thier profits arent even close to this number. If AENG gets up to 50% of the market some year, the numbers are staggering. My personal belief is that 300 million sounds pretty cheap at this stage of the game. If this engine is for real , and im betting it is, I dont really think that we can put a value on this stock. Thanks for listening

To: wonk who wrote (520)	6/4/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: david travis	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 3383

wonk Once again you take the negative side. I can't for the life of me understand your affinity for the confirmed liar Goldy (Buttfinger), I do like Buttfinger better. You questioned me on my post "can't accept at face value" and never once sad anything about the lies from BUTTFINGER, is it OK to use that Batman? You take the time out of the work day to get this post up in the middle of the trading day. A meaningless post made up in your head and written in a way to give the reader doubts. Why didn't you annualize your numbers. With a market of 300,000,000 new engines and a replacement market of BILLIONS of engines your annual figure of 235 million is very small. Anyway what is your motive to cast doubt on the OX2 while you attempt to kiss up to Buttfinger? A confirmed liar, we all know his motives and you say "Now lets be fair to Buttfinger's point of view." A lair, common trash and you never speak out against but always seem to sheild his Butt. Me, the OX2 and AENG always from the negative side, I wonder why. Buttfinger a liar, "lets be fair", me and AENG negative and you can't accept my word "at face value" Your motives are in doubt. Don't you work? Your post came in the middle of the day (the trading day also I might add) when most useful people don't have time to be on the internet writing posts. Was there a reason you felt it necessary to take time from your evidently nonproductive day to post this cry for lets be fair to that scum and try to cast doubt on AENG. Did someone need you to get this out at that time for them? I must say your disertation was very poor. Remember, numbers don't lie..., you know the rest. Your market assumption is way off, most of your other assumptions are way off. Your very generalized assesments of the company itself are to put it mildly, dumb. The team that is running this show are a lot smarter than certainly you. Things are in the very capable hands of some very busy very successful people. None of which that I know have time in the middle of the work day to get on the internet. Did I mention that they were successful? That might explain why they can't be on the internet with you in the middle of the work day. As for every one else I would like you to know that many of your technical questions are going to be reviewed and answered in the near future. A friend in love and war David Travis