SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Famularo who wrote (5303)6/4/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: ddl  Respond to of 7966
 
Frank, put me down for 43 c/ 100t on both, BUT i also expect gem quality to be >50%, otherwise, Sheldon gets to eat my shorts. :-) - denis



To: Famularo who wrote (5303)6/4/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: DIAMOND JIM  Respond to of 7966
 
You would think for consistancy ACA would use 0.8mm at this stage. Perhaps the bulk on K14 would use 1.0mm. The coloured stones are a wild card here. If we see some $/ct based on the K14 450 tn sample with the coloured stones included, the valuation could be very high indeed. Would ACA use any fancies in this calculation and is this an accepted practice? Regards DJ



To: Famularo who wrote (5303)6/4/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: JKNF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7966
 
Hi Frank

Put me down for 63 carats/100 tons. It will be interesting to see who is closest in this contest.

Regards

John