SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Open Text -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Watkins who wrote (850)6/4/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: Walk Softly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1195
 
I just can't get away from the way OTEXF grows core operations at a 100% clip.... FILE and DCTM must envy.... I'm short FILE here... maybe I'll get wacked:-( I suspect the knowledge search aspect of OTEXF gives them the edge.....

C



To: Michael Watkins who wrote (850)6/5/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: Sultan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1195
 
OTEXF has paid $10 million for Revenue of $20 million, if the Globe & Mail was accurate. I find it curious. In this market, it probably means that IDI is bleeding or the installed base has limited life span or something. Otherwise, it would have cost them a lot more. Am I reading too much into this ?



To: Michael Watkins who wrote (850)6/5/1998 4:21:00 AM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1195
 
Michael, The IDI/OTXT deal came as a mild surprise. I had yet to discover these folks! At first blush, it looked like OTXT had beaten Docs at their own game. However, after a bit of investigating, I've come to similar conclusions as most of the folks around here. I found the Gore Group perplexing. Being at the table since the start of the game, kinda reminded me of Docs. OTOH, with all their deadhead software acquisitions (NBI brought back memories), Mr. Copeland also came to mind.

Anyway, I could be wrong, but OTXT bought IDI's customer list not IDI's software. The list is mildly impressive. I believe some of them (for example Dupont) are also Doc's fans which could be quite interesting.

Someone, somewhere, mentioned the cultural differences between the organizations. IDI may be from a different planet. The challenges in this area could well be part of the reason for Gore's abortive 1997 move. If OTXT can control the corporate integration costs, they should get their $10 or(?) $20 million back in short order. If they have to clean house, the new customers will cost much more. Isn't integration a new activity for Mr. Jenkin's Palm Pilot? Good entrapreneurs usually like and excel at new activities. Keeps them from getting bored and having to mow the grass.

I am not yet up to snuff on any of the DM/KM software products. Basis seems to be very similar to LiveLink. I am sure Gore and OTXT had this fact entrenched in their minds during the negotiations. Now, Docs and LiveLink are truly different products. However, they may well be both moving towards the same market. The interesting fact is that IDI has been in this market since before time. Kudos to Jenkins, especially if everything goes smoothly. Both OTXT and DOCS have impress me with their travels todate.

FWIW, My favorite LiveLink (Why don't they use 2 big L's?) site

search.qualcomm.com:3333/otcgi/llscgi60.exe?DB=2&ACTION=Highlight&QUERY=%4E%65%77%62%75%72%79&OP=and&SUBSET=SUBSET&FROM=1&SIZE=10&ITEM=1#test1

Still lurking. nf

PS You may use your real name but you're certainly not a fool, I trust!



To: Michael Watkins who wrote (850)6/9/1998 2:11:00 AM
From: Michael Pascoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1195
 
"Then there is the MS Exchange camp (Eastman, FrontOffice, Microsoft themselves) and Lotus.

I don't think the future is crystal clear yet for any of the aforementioned players"

You must have had your crystal ball out that night Michael! I am hearing rumors that FrontOffice has just gone under.

Michael