SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (19907)6/5/1998 12:02:00 AM
From: Keith Hankin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Here's a must read, with several interesting lines of discussion surrounding open source, the web, and the future:
BETTING ON DARWIN
searls.com



To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (19907)6/5/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: Andy Thomas  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
>>W. Brian Arthur, an economist at the Santa Fe Institute...>>

This idiot is an ivory-tower economist... what does he know about commercial software?

He says MSFT hasn't innovated... i still maintain FAT was innovative at the time of DOS.

MSFT puts new stuff out just as fast as all their little fingers will type... it's just that it's so difficult to get that ever-growing list of bloated features to work together... maybe COM will be the answer... (stifling a guffaw)...

..anyone else here get the sense that all of this is much ado about nothing, and that another major advance in computing is about to hit us all upside the head? This PC thing seems so... ubiquitous and entrenched.... so NSCP gets their browser installed.... nothing from nothing leaves nothing.

FWIW
Andy



To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (19907)6/5/1998 6:40:00 AM
From: Reginald Middleton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24154
 
About the Brian ARther article - If natural monopolies cause a lack of innovation, why didn't the countries with no natural monopolies surpass the US in terms of innovation. The answer is because his assertion is more theory than fact.