Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Andersen who wrote (16458)	6/5/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: Mike Fredericks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

Was this a dead cat bounce? Shorts finally decide to cover? Looks like the air has been let out of the balloon a little this afternoon. I think that the afternoon action may answer the question posed yesterday of "is this smoke?" -Mike (still long... 2 years and counting.)

To: David Andersen who wrote (16458)	6/5/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: KJ. Moy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29386

<<<Can anyone explain the difference between a "director" and a switch? Thanks in advance.>>> The difference is in flexibility. You have to pre-defined which channel connects to which storage devices for a "director". This McData Fibre channel director has 32 ports. Each device has to occupy one port and the relationship of host vs devices have to be pre-defined. You cannot extend the connections to some meaningful distance. All connections have to come to the director via a channel cable(usually is about 150'). I don't think you can daisy chain "directors" together. Each 32 ports have to be its own island. On the other hand, the upper limit of FC switch or hub connections is hugh, it can be in the thousands. And, it can extend the connections to a few miles. Plus, logical connections can be made at the time of usage, unlike a "director", logical and physical connections have to be done before usage. Directors for conventional SCSI, ESCON protocol exist for a long time. This FC director just a natural progression of the similar thing. FC was invented for solving these very limitations imposed by conventional accessing methods. Is this "director" a competition to Ancor or FC switch/hub companies? Somewhat. But, their applications are hardly the same. Data center that does not require clustering, does not require additional storage and storage connections(in a well-planned meshing way), then this director will do. But, then again, why would this same data center bother going to FC.