Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey L. Henken who wrote (1243)	6/5/1998 1:08:00 PM
From: Hoatzin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

Dr. Henken, >>your harassment towards me has not gone unnoticed. Harassment? I made one post to you about a week ago on the CLCK thread, offering my opinion that CLCK's claims to be a "Year 2000" company were not justified. You did not respond. Another poster "nominated" you and Dr. Summers here on this thread for your exchanges over on the AMBI thread. I added some observations of my own, based on what I had read on the CLCK thread. This thread is clearly labelled as a knock-about joint where insults and criticism (justified or not) are in plentiful supply. Welcome to the internet. >> I would advise you to ask SI to remove your previous posts where you have referred to me as a hypester and a moron. You asked me a direct question, "You think I'm a hypester? A moron or both?" I lazily answered "Yes", because I had no desire to decompose the question and give a compound answer. I do not think you are a moron, please consider this a public apology for suggesting as much. (The post of yours I referred to here #reply-4586145 gave an incorrect and laughable account of "price earnings to growth ratio" or PEG. Not really "moronic", but hardly the work of a "very serious investor", as you describe yourself.) The term "hypester" is quite subjective. I think the relentless enthusiasm with which you promote CLCK on Silicon Investor qualifies as hype, and I am entitled to my opinion. Specifically, I have in mind your repeated use of such catch phrases as "Click on CLCK!!!", and your assertion that CLCK is like "a license to print money for shareholders." >>You have absolutely no proof for your contentions. In fact you are only guessing that Columbia Capital will fail based on standard disclosure language. I did not say that Columbia Capital will fail. >>I see nothing in that language that shows anything beyond a full disclosure of the risk associated with being an investor in the company. Which is why I went to all the trouble of copying and pasting it. Because my point is that the risks associated with being an investor in CLCK, as laid out in the 10KSB, are numerous and severe. >> I have myself on many occasions pasted the URL for the 10KSB. I think there's a difference between pasting the link and discussing the dangers listed within. Late breaking news: one the many risks I referred to up thread has been addressed - biz.yahoo.com Columbia Capital Names Two Independent Directors FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 5, 1998--Columbia Capital Corp. (OTC BB:CLCK - news; Nasdaq:CLCK-BB) announced today that it had appointed two independent directors to its Board of Directors. These appointments will increase the size of the Board from five to seven members. The new directors are Donald L. Thone and Robert M. Feldman. Well, that's nice. Interesting that CLCK still refers to themselves as "Nasdaq: CLCK-BB", which is not the case. Dr. Henken, I wish you success with your investments, this is my final post to you on this or any other thread.