Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FlatTaxMan who wrote (6629)	6/5/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: Scott H.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

I had also thought of that possibility. If they do need more cash to grow the business, then I have no problem with them selling shares and pumping the proceeds back into the company, or re-couping some of their up front capital. I would hope that you are right - that people wouldn't spend two years developing the concept and then cash out. But then again, who knows - if it looks like the subscriptions are not coming in as planned, the temptation to take the money and run is always there. I am not saying this will happen, just that we should consider the possibility that it might. It has happened with other companies - and the existing shareholders get burned as the stock price gets diluted. One solution might be for them to re-restrict a portion of the shares and then cash in some of the others for their cash/marketing needs.