SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dave brown who wrote (20439)6/5/1998 7:00:00 PM
From: Double Dipper  Respond to of 27968
 
Dave,

My prediction. Your better than 90% correct. Not sure of the time frame but I have not seen anything come to fruition yet other than some personnel shuffling. Looks like more smoke and mirrors to me.

Talk of big contracts and celebrity interviews. Name change of Myriad to Firamada PEO. More talk of audits and reviews. I'm tired of it all. Like I've said a hundred times, nothing happens to this stock until the first couple of quarters come in. Then they can forget last year all together, which, IMO has been their objective all along.

Reverse Split. I would bet my entire holdings right here and now it will happen before years end. Why, Because despite everything, this company can make it but needs share price and revenue for a NASDAQ listing. Once their quarters roll in and I believe they will be good, everyone will forget 1997 and first half of 98 and be just delighted with the New and Improved FAMH.

That is what I believe and the reason my shares are still on the shelf. I like the company but not its management. For the record I would be gone now but made a HUGE mistake and bought back in. Now I have to be long because I refuse to take this loss when I know the stock will turn around in six months.

Kevin - Still calling it like I see it.




To: dave brown who wrote (20439)6/5/1998 7:04:00 PM
From: Mel Viticus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27968
 
Better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt..

Anyway can think of wickedly evil scenarios to match the intent of your insidious posts... but can you be a clever stooge and think of an ingenious mechanism whereby this company might return from the oblivion to which you have destined it?

That would be much more impressive Davey.

Oh, and if you're thinking of asking why I don't offer solutions? Because I would rather listen and learn from constructive criticism balanced by concerted strategic ideas.

I have never implied (as you do, by the tone of your "doomsday" proselytizing) that I am all knowing.

Show us you're a "clever stooge" Davey Brown.



To: dave brown who wrote (20439)6/5/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: Gary Smith  Respond to of 27968
 
IMO, the three things that killed this stock are:

1. Not delivering audited financials as promised.
2. Ira's boneheaded mind fart on this thread about a "share exchange" (read reverse split).
3. Arif issuing exorbitant numbers of shares to himself.

The good news is that :

1. The audited financials are most certainly on their way in proper form for the SEC.
2. The RS issue has been declared dead.
3. Arif, himself, said in yesterday's CC that there are discussions underway w/ the proper professionals on the best way to retire some of those shares.

In consideration of the above, the stock should rebound nicely.

Let's all focus in on the positive, professional steps in good business practice we are now seeing, and hope that Arif has seen the light.

Luck to all--we could use it,
Gary



To: dave brown who wrote (20439)6/6/1998 12:11:00 AM
From: Dick Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27968
 
Dave. Who is the largest single shareholder behind Arif Adam? How many shares does he/she own? What leverage does this person have?

If you don't know the answers to these questions your statement, "Arif will not take shares off the table", is not worth the value of the salt in the shaker.

Do you know the answers to these questions? If you do, please share them with us. If not, I suggest your statement is pure conjecture and founded on sand.

LTBFV, Dick