Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arcon Energy (MIDL Presently) The Ultimate Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ESPY who wrote (2642)	6/5/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

****************** Major Short Play ********** Short E Trade !!!! Just kidding. They don't look like a good short today. Say, are you reading this thread? That message has been posted ... I think 4 times today. Did you Call E Trade? Do you have another Broker you can call? Did you need the Number for the Transfer Agent? What is it? Ray PS: Remind me to tell you the story of how E Trade forgot to File in Ohio by the deadline and I rescinded all my trades I didn't like that ....... YEAR.**

To: ESPY who wrote (2642)	6/6/1998 3:26:00 AM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Well I wonder why no other brokerage house has that message. Of course Dan Fisher did make statements he was thinking about it. However to lower it then get people in then raise is not cool ... I do notthink they would het away with it personally. Now I agree they can reduce it as they want I do not care but raising it is another story. Warrant shareholders have rights too though they do not have voting power they have bought on a .50 dividend and it better stay there too. I doubt we will see it raised up. LOL ... After raising cain I suggested a .25 that John suggested to me before. That would make the warrant holders very happy. Problem is it would instantly set up arbitrage. Also after thinking the optional converting of the Ps in not wish either because it will instantly set up arbitrage also. SO I am back to my orginal concept to just extend the conversion date to Oct 1999 optional is not an option with me only for arbitraguers. GB