SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (11204)6/5/1998 10:18:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Re - CDMA is about maximizing information flow in any medium.

No, not really. In an interference free environment, CDMA can actually underperform other, more basic systems. But of course most of the world is pretty noisy. Especially in a cell system where all you neighbors are shouting at the same frequencies.

Why not down wires or fibres?

There is actually a lot to be said for this, since cable tv, for instance, has a lot of interference in some frequency bands, and so they just don't use them. CDMA might allow them to overcome that problem and get more out of their existing cables. However, most of Qualcomm's expertise and IPR is in cell system CDMA, not cable (and the implimentation is likely to be quite different.).

Clark



To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (11204)6/5/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: Jim Fleming  Respond to of 152472
 
Take a look at this site

http:www.terayon.com

jef



To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (11204)6/5/1998 11:16:00 PM
From: Jim Fleming  Respond to of 152472
 
Here is another cable CDMA site. CSCO bought the Sanders Division and the technology from LMT since the trials mentioned in this press release.

sanders.com

jef



To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (11204)6/6/1998 4:20:00 AM
From: gdichaz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Terayon - a small private company - in which Cisco has a stake has developed CDMA for wire. As best I can tell, no connection or fees to the Q. How Terayon manages to avoid the Q 's patents is not clear to me, but seemingly that is the case. Interestingly, though Terayon's CDMA transmission technology is the superior one, the company was forced to accept and use a less powerful system for its "mainstream" products by a "standards system" used by the other companies in its field. Wish it were public since think the future bright for Terayon. As of now, think Cisco is only practical way to participate in CDMA over wire - unless the Q has a way, now or in the future. Comments? Chaz