SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Three Amigos Stock Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LTK007 who wrote (5660)6/5/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29382
 



> Homebuilders Could Fly High Again
>
> By Vito J. Racanelli
>
> After more than doubling in the 12 months ended in March,
> homebuilders'
> stocks sold off big time this spring amid worries that the Federal
> Reserve
> would raise interest rates later this year.
>
> The Dow Jones home construction group was the second best
> performing of all
> the industry groups. But with rate worries rising, sentiment
> turned
> negative on the stocks and they gave up a big chunk of their gains,
> falling
> much further than the broader market in recent months. (The group
> rallied
> by about 2% last week, but has given back some of its gains this
> week.)
>
> Now, however, interest rates have begun to slip again in the wake
> of more
> turmoil in Asia. Along with the strong economy and the buoyant
> housing
> market, that may make these stocks--many of which trade
> significantly off
> their 52-week highs--an attractive buying opportunity.
>
> "I don't see any chance of a sustained rise in U.S. interest
> rates," says
> Timothy Jones, an analyst at Southeast Research Partners and a 30-
> year
> industry veteran. Jones and other bulls on housing stocks think any
> hike
> would be limited to 25 to 50 basis points, which they maintain
> would have
> little effect on construction activity. (Some, like Michael Via, an
> analyst
> at Anderson & Strudwick, are even predicting rates will fall.)
>
> Meanwhile, backlogs and orders--which foreshadow earnings two or
> three
> quarters down the line--are up, Jones adds. "I continue to have to
> raise
> earnings estimates for the group," he says. While housing starts
> fell 2.3%
> in April from March and 2.5% in March from February, the drop was
> mainly
> in multifamily housing. (Unseasonably warm weather also inflated
> winter
> construction figures.) Meanwhile, April single family housing
> starts were
> up, as were permits, a leading indicator. The National Association
> of Home
> Builders' housing market index inched up to 68 in May from 67 in
> April,
> suggesting market conditions remain strong.
>
> Jones says he expects earnings growth of at least 15% this year
> among the
> major publicly traded home construction firms, far higher than the
> low
> single-digit earnings increases expected from the S&P 500. Among
> his
> favorites are Lennar (LEN) and D.R. Horton (DHI), where he projects
> earnings growth of 20% over the next two years.
>
> And both companies are selling at a discount to their growth rate.
> According to First Call, Lennar should earn $2.62 per share next
> year, up
> over 30% from this year; it sells at about 11x 1999 profit
> projections.
> Horton also trades at 11x 1999 earnings estimates, a discount to
> its
> expected profit growth of 17% from 1998.
>
> Some other analysts have come to believe the trends for the group
> are
> positive now that a rate rise doesn't appear to be in the cards.
> Mike
> Corelli, an analyst at Du Pasquier & Co., says he has become more
> positive
> about these stocks, in part because deflationary pressures from
> Asia have
> driven down the prices of commodities that are vital components for
> homebuilders. Lumber prices, for example, are down 25% from a year
> ago and
> copper has fallen some 35%. At least some of that is bound to be
> reflected
> in the bottom line of these companies.
>
> One of Corelli's favorites in the group is Oakwood Homes Corp.
> (OH), a
> producer of manufactured housing. (Unlike on-site builders,
> companies like
> Oakwood make modular homes components that are put together at the
> site.)
>
> The company stumbled earlier this year when it had to take a
> 21-cents-a-share charge for underestimating past loan prepayments
> and
> default rates among some of its customers. But in the last two
> years the
> company has moved to a "very conservative" stance that will
> preclude this
> problem in the future, he says.
>
> Corelli estimates Oakwood will earn about $1.83 a share this year
> (after
> the charge) and $2.33 next year--but could hit $2.40 to $2.50 a
> share next
> year if the recent acquisition of Schult Homes Corp. meets
> expectations.
> In 1997, the company earned $1.75 a share. At Thursday's close of
> $27 5/8,
> Oakwood trades at about 11.5x 1999 estimates, while other
> manufactured
> housing companies sell at 13x-14x 1999 earnings projections.
>
> As if anticipating good news, some Oakwood insiders--who were
> selling
> shares between November and February--are now nibbling at the stock
> once
> again. In April, Oakwood director Lanty Smith purchased 10,000
> shares at
> $29.25 to $29.50 a share.
>
> In the manufactured housing group, analyst Michael Via likes
> Cavalier
> Homes (CAV), an Addison, Alabama-based small cap. An inventory glut
> in the
> Southeast that led to a 2.8% decrease in U.S. manufactured housing
> shipments last year "is being cleared out," he says. (Indeed, in
> the most
> recent report, the Southeast showed the most robust housing sales
> of any
> region.) Manufactured housing trends have improved this year, with
> shipments up about 3.2% in 1998 versus a 2.8% drop last year. From
> 1992 to
> 1996, shipments rose 72%.
>
> The company's recent acquisition of Belmont Homes not only doubled
> its
> size but also took out one of its main competitors, and Cavalier
> will begin
> to show up on institutional radar screens, he said. Cavalier
> settled
> Thursday at $11 per share, or about 12 times First Call's consensus
> 1998
> estimates of 93 cents per share and at nine times estimates of
> $1.25 per
> share in 1999.
>
> Those low multiples--and the lessening threat of a rate hike by
> the
> Fed--are beginning to make these stocks appealing to investors once
> again.