SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grainne who wrote (17126)6/6/1998 1:29:00 AM
From: Father Terrence  Respond to of 39621
 
Christine:

The list of horrors throughout the centuries is a very long one. I agree, IMO he would've been angered and saddened. It is certainly not the philosophy he promoted. Although I do not agree with his philosophy, I do not believe he ever would've advocated -- let alone supported -- the likes of picketing Goldwater's funeral (or put up for 2 seconds with crazy Jane or Evil Emile).

Father Terrence



To: Grainne who wrote (17126)6/7/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Sam Ferguson  Respond to of 39621
 
CONCEPTS OF THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN -PAGE 2

Jesus' ideal concept largely failed, but upon the foundation of the
Master's personal life and teachings, supplemented by the Greek and
Persian concepts of eternal life and augmented by Philo's doctrine of
the temporal contrasted with the spiritual, Paul went forth to build
up one of the most progressive human societies which has ever existed
on earth.

The concept of Jesus is still alive in the advanced religions of the
world. Paul's Christian church is the socialized and humanized shadow
of what Jesus intended the kingdom of heaven to be--and what it most
certainly will yet become. Paul and his successors partly transferred
the issues of eternal life from the individual to the church. Christ
thus became the head of the church rather than the elder brother of
each individual believer in the Father's family of the kingdom.

Paul and his contemporaries applied all of Jesus' spiritual
implications regarding himself and the individual believer to the
church as a group of believers; and in doing this, they struck a
deathblow to Jesus' concept of the divine kingdom in the heart of the
individual believer.

And so, for centuries, the Christian church has labored under great
embarrassment because it dared to lay claim to those mysterious
powers and privileges of the kingdom, powers and privileges which can
be exercised and experienced only between Jesus and his spiritual
believer brothers. And thus it becomes apparent that membership in the
church does not necessarily mean fellowship in the kingdom; one is
spiritual, the other mainly social.

Sooner or later another and greater John the Baptist is due to arise
proclaiming "the kingdom of God is at hand"--meaning a return to the
high spiritual concept of Jesus, who proclaimed that the kingdom is
the will of his heavenly Father dominant and transcendent in the heart
of the believer--and doing all this without in any way referring either
to the visible church on earth or to the anticipated second coming of
Christ. There must come a revival of the actual teachings of Jesus,
such a restatement as will undo the work of his early followers who
went about to create a sociophilosophical system of belief regarding
the fact of Michael's sojourn on earth. In a short time the teaching
of this story about Jesus nearly supplanted the preaching of Jesus'
gospel of the kingdom. In this way a historical religion displaced
that teaching in which Jesus had blended man's highest moral ideas and
spiritual ideals with man's most sublime hope for the future--eternal
life. And that was the gospel of the kingdom.

It is just because the gospel of Jesus was so many-sided that within
a few centuries students of the records of his teachings became
divided up into so many cults and sects. This pitiful subdivision of
Christian believers results from failure to discern in the Master's
manifold teachings the divine oneness of his matchless life. But
someday the true believers in Jesus will not be thus spiritually
divided in their attitude before unbelievers. Always we may have
diversity of intellectual comprehension and interpretation, even
varying degrees of socialization, but lack of spiritual brotherhood
is both inexcusable and reprehensible.

Mistake not! there is in the teachings of Jesus an eternal nature which
will not permit them forever to remain unfruitful in the hearts of
thinking men. The kingdom as Jesus conceived it has to a large extent
failed on earth; for the time being, an outward church has taken its
place; but you should comprehend that this church is only the larval
stage of the thwarted spiritual kingdom, which will carry it through
this material age and over into a more spiritual dispensation where
the Master's teachings may enjoy a fuller opportunity for development.
Thus does the so-called Christian church become the cocoon in which
the kingdom of Jesus' concept now slumbers. The kingdom of the divine
brotherhood is still alive and will eventually and certainly come forth
from this long submergence, just as surely as the butterfly eventually
emerges as the beautiful unfolding of its less attractive creature of
metamorphic development.

I believe Jesus the man was an avatar to enlighten us. This is a belief
carried forth by the Essene sect. Whether he was an actual living man
I cannot confirm. Neither do I believe nor did he say in the bible he
came to give his life for us. Regardless of the man Jesus (factual or
fictional) he taught a truth that I have personally experienced and
something I know to be true.

Truth of religion is what I sought with diligence and it has grown and
expanded for the last 25 years. I hope this will further explain my
beliefs and why I say all paths lead to God. Do I have all the answers
of truth? NO. Truth is ever changing though most will not understand
the statement. As my knowledge increases I can understand higher truths
than in the preceeding level of consciousness. I am sure this is true
for all of us.