SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Mansfield who wrote (11875)6/6/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: sibe  Respond to of 13949
 
Resurgence for certain Y2k companies:
Message 4749649



To: John Mansfield who wrote (11875)6/7/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13949
 
John,I am not a Y2K specialist,in fact I am a Y2K ignoramus--I come to
this thread to have something that an analyst on CNBC said,verified--he
recommended Compaq as a strong buy because of its strong commitment
to the Y2K problem--is this now possible due to their acquisition of
DEC---John do you know of anything regards ComPaq getting deeply involved in the Y2K business---this would make that company,I think
a good buy.Max



To: John Mansfield who wrote (11875)6/8/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
The June 15 edition of Time Magazine has a four page article on Y2K entitled "Apocalypse Not", with the subtitle of "The Y2K computer glitch is plenty serious, but don't panic". There's also a special box with the heading "Why the Government's Machines Won't Make it".

My favorite part is the last paragraph:
As a futurist, however, Saffo does see an opportunity in all this to help distant generations. "For God's sake, let's go to five digits [for calendar dates in software] so we don't have a Y10K problem," he advises. Amen.

Oh that's great. To avoid another 8000 years of lame Time articles about programs that are unable handle dates correctly, we'll be designing software to treat, for instance, today, as "06/08/01998".

I think the key to getting published in a major newspaper or magazine about Y2K is to entitle your article: "Y2K. Will the earth come to a fiery end?" or something like that. I suppose what worries me the most is that C-Span's recent Y2K coverage actually held my attention longer than Time.

- Jeff