Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (6140)	6/6/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Charles, neither of these news releases mention the Evil empire" nor do these releases imply that GPGI ores (or IPMCF's for that matter) contain 6 ounces per ton. To post Twifford letter in which there is such an implication is nothing short of hype and jensen should stop his people from engaging in these activities. We have heard too many numbers between sub 1 ounce/ton all the way to 16 Oz/ton. The lack of consistent assessments is what is driving potential investors like Larry away from this stock. Zeev

To: go4it who wrote (6140)	6/6/1998 8:44:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Charles: Actually, the PR's you posted are not the 3 letters I was referring to. The 3 letters are included in posts 5989, 6032, and 6130 by Ed Fishbaine. Note the considerably different amount of hype in the non-official letters posted as compared to the official company press releases you posted. The 3 letters remind me of the infamous IPMCF "Chickens Coming Home to Roost," comments while the PR's are cosiderably more reserved. I'm sure this difference is what Zeev is referring to when he uses the "plausible deniability" description.