Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (3261)	6/6/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

>>>>>The idea that MM's totally manipulate the market is just BS to hide the basic market principle of supply and demand and explain away why a stock that they are hyping isn't going anywhere<<<<< What warrants a "hype" TC ? I have continuosly said, and asked you directly the other night, can't 'we' wait for the next release to define for 'all of us' exactly where TVSI is directed. I say this again, to remind you TC, TVSI is a very attractive shell, isn't that why Raabe moved into it in the first place? At this point, again, all that I can find publically about TVSI aquisitions is NIWOT, is that hypeing? I posted what I found. I also posted bits & pieces of what Steve Cayou told me in conversation , Is that hypeing? From that, you claim I am "hypeing" TVSI? Rumor is TVSI is a very attractive shell to other interests also, which was demonstrated with the volume of buying last week. I am long TVSI and will be until I can no longer justify the merit of the investment. At this point I'm waiting for the next release to assist me in making that decision. IMO, the dump & pump theatrics of those who stalked me on this thread and to Big Dog's thread demonstrated 'hype'. These are individuals who had not recently been posting on this thread , yet decided, after a 10 min. delay in trading , to start their "hype". You, at times , sound like a broken record. Your focus is always me and Riley, not the stock. I consider it harrassment and do not see why you are allowed to focus on S.I. members as opposed to the companies/stocks for which the threads are named. Pugs