Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (46560)	6/6/1998 9:45:00 PM
From: Jack T. Pearson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Chuzzlewit, Will Dell's vendors also see savings when Dell implements electronic logistic management? Jack

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (46560)	6/6/1998 11:44:00 PM
From: Geoff Nunn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Chuz, If Dell reduces its inventory holding period from 8 to 4 days, I would expect two major benefits: 1. Dell would benefit from a lower cost of capital, as you have already explained; 2. Dell would benefit from savings due to reduced inventory obsolescence. According to a rule of thumb I've seen, pc components decline in value on average at the rate of about 1% per week. This means a component held for one year would be expected to lose ~ 41% of its value. If a PC manufacturer holds a component for one yr., its total inventory cost is the cost of capital plus obsolescence cost. Given that Dell's cost of capital is the current yield on Treasury bonds plus a few points, say 10%, this would suggest an annualized total inventory cost of ~51%. If Dell reduces its inventory period from 8 to 4 days, we should expect total inventory costs to fall by 50%. Correct? Unfortunately, I don't have Dell's annual report and don't know what their average inventory stock is, in dollars. Let's assume it's $1bil. This would mean Dell's current annual inventory cost is $510m. Therefore, if Dell doubles it's inventory turnover, costs should fall by one half, which would mean savings of $255m on an annual basis. Of course, this is all purely hypothetical because I don't have the real numbers. Geoff