Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : General Lithography -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl R. who wrote (1051)	6/18/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: James Word	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1305

Carl RE: "Veeco AFM" Whoops, sorry it's taken me so long to respond to your message, I haven't read this thread in awhile. I would still not call the tool production ready, at least not compared to CD-SEMs. The main problems with the tool are still there: 1.) Tip calibration. SInce the tips wear out, get chipped, pick up gunk, the tip width is always a big variable, constant calibration is a necessity. 2.) Tip lifetime. They still break too often, and the smaller the tip, the more they break. 3.) Throughput. 6-10 wafers per hour ain't gonna cut it. That said, I still think every fab should have one for engineering work, but SEMs are still the way to go for in-line CD measurements. As for Digital instruments, they may be able to teach Veeco a thing or too about AFMs, maybe enough to help them increase the lifetime of their tips. Changing tips is a real bitch on these things. I think that if they keep up the improvements, and if CD SEMs level off in resolution improvemnts, maybe the AFMs have a future for 0.13um metrology. I would still bet my money on SEMs, though. James Word.