To: D LEE who wrote (5543 ) 6/7/1998 8:34:00 AM From: K A Anderson Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6654
Dave It is good to see Charlie back and yes I do now the meaning of eye strain, but in this case it leads to elevated blood pressures and a shortening of tempers. Its strange that you state that people are standing behind me, when really in fact they are just standing up for themselves on this issue, those that contributed to the lawyer are just as capable of calling him and getting an update, provide information and what ever else they feel the need to talk to him about, and its not any of my business. All I did was provide some focus and options for them. Some one had to put their name on the dotted line, to get the ball rolling, so I did. The truth of this matter will come out in one way or the other, and if I wasnt at least 98% sure the share holders have been taken advantage of, I would not be running the risks that I have. In your previous post you are very right, with these shells any future is possible, that is why people invest. But the general rule of thumb is the private company buys and adds to the value of the shell, not the shell fianancing the private company... this sends up so many red flags its not funny, and the market reacts accordingly... as we are witnessing. This whole deal isnt right and its pretty obvious to everyone but Jack. we get into a legal grey area, but Jack is supposed to answer to a BOD, a BOD is supposed to maintain a standard of checks and balances, so that no one is acting in an unquestioned manner, well Jack is fighting to have a BOD put in place, because he has unquestioned run of the asylum at the moment, but all this is going to end very soon. He can say what ever he wants but it doesnt no change that fact. The judge awarded us 1. No changes in the company at all... until a real BOD was elected via the proxy vote. The date of record was set at June 3, so that no stock could be transfered in a manipulative way, thus surprising and catching anyone considering this completly off guard. Thus the vote cannot be "spiked" or rigged, you know this new Reg S issue coming out in the morning did leave that possiblity open. 2. The new BOD has the right to examine the deal and act in the best interests of CVIA, not Jack Arnold and WOTD. 3. To reveal the corporate documents and records. Does this seem like unreasonable requests? Its the law. its the shareholders rights. So if all this is legit, what is Jack trying to appeal? or better yet hide? Jack will be making a huge mistake by appealing, because he is opening the door to more revelations, why do you thing only after all this he started recently making revelations about the $500k loan? He has had since January to do it. He knows that we know so he is trying some damage control. Can't say I blame him, but he should get with the program and start revealing things to the share holders and acting like the CEO of CVIA and not a greedy flunky of the mystery guys. Also we will be getting the corporate records in the next day or so. I am going to just let him say what he wants about me, none of it is true and like everything else, time will prove him wrong and once again end looking foolish for saying these things. KAA