Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Caussa Capital (formerly Antares) T.CAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill718 who wrote (3402)	6/8/1998 2:31:00 AM
From: Mike G	Respond to of 4718

I think the Royal Oak development has more meaning here than anyone knows. When I was flying on an airplane a couple of years ago, it was a geologist that was on the same plane that recommended that I seriously look into AGC Americas Gold Corp as he said it looked really good. He said that he will never invest in a gold stock unless he has worked the site, and that the AGA (AGC Americas Gold Corp) was one really worth looking into from his perspective. He said that it was near the Royal Oak Site, where they were building the large camp. Someone mentioned earlier about the bargain prices of junior stocks now, and no doubt all of these are bargains, but Royal Oak could help AGA, and ANZ and the converse would be true. It cost Royal Oak over 400 million dollars to complete the mill but if they could use the same infrastructure to process both sites, the costs would be beneficial to all concerned. Also someone mentioned about take overs. The costs to take over both ANZ and AGA at this time would not be very significant when you compare it to the cost of building a $490 million processing plant. I can hardly wait until RYO sells it's 1st bar of gold, which should help everyone in the area.