SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank Brisebois who wrote (3784)6/8/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: Rockhill  Respond to of 4571
 
Thanks Frank eom.

Rockhill



To: Frank Brisebois who wrote (3784)6/8/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: Andrew G.  Respond to of 4571
 
Yes, Frank. But they don't have to take 4 months. They can commit at any time that they deem prudent to do so. At least that's my interpretation. They have been studying it for 1.5 years now so it's not like they are looking at for the first time.

The stock is getting totally trashed by fickle daytraders who ran it up this morning presenting an ideal opportunity to accumulate at these levels.

The license would be exclusive so when they take it, we know what the proven reserves are so it's an automatic home run IMO.

I'm willing to bet it won't be four months. Even if it was, at these prices it's worth it.



To: Frank Brisebois who wrote (3784)6/8/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: DDS-OMS  Respond to of 4571
 
Frank,

Here is the proposed EPA cleanup and some of the history of this area. Stauffer Chemical was taken over by International Chemical--who is now responsible for the cost of cleanup. Mining of the polluting metals is apparently now EPA's solution. I would imagine ICI would back BCMD financially to get this albatross off of their back. BCMD would assume no liability as to success or failure of the remediation efforts as far as the EPA is concerned. This is a LONG post--near the end I have highlighted the mining solution.

Site Name: IRON MOUNTAIN MINE
EPA ID: CAD980498612 EPA Region: 09 Metro Statistical Area: 6690
Street: OFF HWY 299 9 MI NW OF
City: REDDING State: CA Zip: 96001
Congressional District: 02
County Code: 089 County Name: SHASTA
National Priority List (NPL) Status: F
Proposed NPL Update Number: Final NPL Update Number:
Ownership Indicator: PR
Federal Facility Flag: N Federal Facility Docket: F
Latitude: 4040180 Longitude: 12231401
LL Source: E LL Accuracy:
Incident Type: N Incident Category: T
Resource and Recovery Act Facility: FMS SS ID: 0917
Dioxin Tier: USGS Hydro Unit: 18020101
Site Description:
MINING ACTIVITIES FROM LATE 1800'S TO 1963 CREATED PILES OF TAILINGS,UNDERGROUND MINE WORKINGS & OPEN PITS CONTAINING MINE WASTE.ACID LEACHATE CONTAINING HEAVY METALS CONTAMINATESURFACE WATER. POTENTIAL DRINKING WATER IMPACTS (44,000).

Remediation Information (Records of Decision)

Site Name: IRON MOUNTAIN MINE
EPA ID: CAD980498612
Operable Unit: 02
ROD ID: EPA/ROD/R09-92/083 ROD Date: 09/30/92
Contaminant: Metals
O&M Costs: Estimated Costs:
Keys: ARAR Waiver; Background Levels; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation;
Interim Remedy; Lead; MCLGs; MCLs; Metals; Mining Wastes; Offsite
Treatment;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water; Surface Water Collection/Diversion; Surface Water
Treatment.

Abstract:
SITE HISTORY/DESCRIPTION: The 4,400-acre Iron Mountain Mine (IMM)
site is a collection of inactive mines and associated property located on
Iron Mountain, Shasta County, California. Land use in the area is
predominantly commercial, with a wetlands located within 9 miles from the
site. The Sacramento River is a major fishery and source of drinking water
for the City of Redding, which is located 9 miles east of the site. IMM
contains several inactive underground and open pit mines, numerous waste
piles, abandoned mining facilities, and mine drainage treatment facilities.
From 1879 to present, several owners, including RhonePoulenc Basic
Chemicals, mined copper and other metals, such as gold, silver, pyrite, and
zinc. In 1894, Mountain Mining Company acquired and began operating the
mine. Mining waste generated was dumped into ravines and washed into several
creeks, including Boulder and Sacramento. In 1896, Mountain Copper
Companyassumed ownership, and mining activities continued intermittently
from the 1880's until 1962. In 1968, Stauffer Chemical Company acquired
Mountain Copper and operated a copper cementation plant. In 1976, the state
issued Stauffer Chemical an order requiring an abatement of the continuing
pollution from IMM. Throughout the years, mining activities at IMM resulted
in deposits of waste rock and pyrite tailings on the exposed ground surface,
in addition to rain and surface flows, which formed acid mine drainage and
transported contaminants to surface water and sediments. In 1983, EPA
identified IMM as the largest discharger of toxic metals in the United
States. A 1986 ROD provided limited source control and management actions
to lessen discharge of AMD to surface waters. This ROD addresses control of
the AMD sources in the Boulder Creek drainage basin from the Richmond and
Lawson portals. Two planned RODs will address AMD to Slickrock Creek,
sources for Boulder Creek drainage (excluded from this ROD), contaminated
ground water, and other sources of contamination. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the sediment, debris, and surface water are metals,
including lead. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS: Sediment and surface water
clean-up goals are based on background levels as established by SWDA MCLs or
health based levels, whichever is more stringent. Chemical-specific sediment
and surface water goals include antimony 0.006 mg/l; arsenic 0.050 mg/l;
cadmium 0.01 mg/l; and mercury 0.002 mg/l. INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not
provided.


Remedy:
SELECTED REMEDIAL ACTION: The selected remedial action for this site
includes collecting the acid mine drainage from the Richmond and Lawson
portals and constructing pipelines and necessary structures to transport the
drainage into the treatment facility; treating the acid mine drainage by
chemical neutralization/precipitation using the lime/sulfide High Density
Sludge (HDS) treatment process, and discharging the treated effluent onsite
to surface water; disposing of the residual sludge onsite in the inactive
open pit mine; excavating, consolidating onsite, and capping seven waste
piles that are actively eroding and discharging hazardous substances; and
diverting ground water and surface water away from the landfill. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial action is $53,958,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $27,865,000 for 30 years.


[It is my understanding that ICI is on the hook for these costs,($54Mm initial and $895,950,000 over the next 30 years) and it would seem to me that they would be tickled to underwrite BCMD startup costs to reopen this mine.]


Operable Unit: 09
ROD ID: EPA/ROD/R09-93/101 ROD Date: 09/24/93
Contaminant: Metals, Acids
O&M Costs: Estimated Costs:
Keys: Acids; Arsenic; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Interim Remedy; MCLGs; MCLs;
Metals;
Mining Wastes; O&M; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Safe Drinking
Water
Act; State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; Surface Water Monitoring; Surface Water
Treatment;
Treatability Studies

Abstract:
SITE HISTORY/DESCRIPTION:

The 4,400-acre Iron Mountain Mine site is a commercial mining facility
located 9 miles northwest of Redding, Shasta County, California. Land use
in the area is predominantly recreational, with largely undeveloped
wilderness property. The site is bordered by two heavily used national
forests, and is located near the Sacramento River. The estimated 70,000
people who reside in Redding use the river as a major source of drinking
water. The Iron Mountain Mine site includes mining property on the
topographic feature known as Iron Mountain, the several inactive underground
and open pit mines, numerous waste piles, abandoned mining facilities, mine
drainage treatment facilities, and the downstream reaches of all creeks and
rivers affected by drainage from Iron Mountain Mine. In 1894, The Mountain
Mining Co., Ltd. began operation of the mine. Later, Mountain Copper Co.
assumed ownership of the site. Under this company's operation, high-grade
copper ore was mined until 1907 in the Old Mine, and from 1907, until as
late as 1923, in Mine No. 8. In 1968, the mine was acquired by Stauffer
Chemical Co., and was operated there until 1976. In 1976, the State
required the abatement of the continuing pollution from the mountain. Iron
Mountain Mines, Inc. (IMMI) acquired a majority of the parcels to the mine
in 1976 and currently operates the facilities. IMMI constructed a copper
cementation plant on a nearby creek to recover copper from the acid mine
drainage (AMD). Due to various fish kills and toxicity problems, a number
of investigations were conducted by the State which revealed high
concentrations of copper, cadmium, and zinc in the acidic discharges flowing
from the Old and No. 8 mines into Slickrock Creek, a tributary of Spring
Creek, which in turn is a tributary of the Sacramento River. A 1986 ROD
addressed limited source control and water management actions, which
included constructing a partial cap over a mineralized zone, constructing
diversions of various creeks to avoid an AMD-generating slide and to protect
cleaner waters, and enlarging the Spring Creek Debris Dam. A 1992 ROD
addressed contaminants seeping from the two largest sources of AMD at the
mine and from the numerous waste rock piles, tailing piles, seeps, and
contaminated sediment for the Boulder Creek OU. This ROD addresses an
interim remedy for the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep OU, the third largest area of AMD
contamination at the site. Future RODs will address resource recovery and
additional source control. The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the surface water are metals, including arsenic, copper, cadmium, and zinc;
and acids.

SELECTED REMEDIAL ACTION:

The selected remedial action for this site includes treating acid- and heavy
metal-contaminated surface water onsite using chemical
neutralization/precipitation with HDS process option; constructing
collection structures, pipelines, and equalization equipment to provide for
delivery and onsite treatment of all base, sustained, and peak AMD flows
from the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep to an elevated tank at the Minnesota Flats
treatment facility, located 24,000 feet from the discharge area; and
disposing of residuals onsite in an inactive open pit mine. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is $8,270,000, which includes an
estimated total O&M cost of $3,920,000.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:

Not provided.

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:

Not applicable.

RECORD OF DECISION
IRON MOUNTAIN MINE
SHASTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

THE DECLARATION

I. SITE NAME AND LOCATION

Iron Mountain Mine
Shasta County, California (near Redding, California)

II. STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE

This decision document presents the selected interim remedial action for
control of heavy-metal-bearing acidic discharges, termed acid mine drainage,
or AMD, from the Old and No. 8 Mines into Slickrock Creek. These discharges
are the third largest source of AMD at the Iron Mountain Mine Superfund
Site. Slickrock Creek is a tributary of Spring Creek, which in turn is a
tributary of the Sacramento River. Slickrock Creek is on the south side of
the Iron Mountain Mine (IMM) site. The IMM site is located about 9 miles
northwest of Redding, California.

The selected interim remedial action is to collect and treat the AMD from
Old/No. 8 Mine Seep. The selected interim remedial action was chosen in
accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA), and the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This decision is based upon the
administrative record for this site.

The Natural Resource Trustees Council, which includes both State and Federal
resource trustees for the Site, concurs with the selection of treatment and
the High Density Sludge (HDS) process option as the interim remedial action
for the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep acid mine drainage discharges.

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) concur with the selection of lime
treatment and use of a process option that will produce a dense sludge as
the interim remedial action for the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep acid mine drainage
discharges. However, DTSC and RWQCB have encouraged EPA to fully evaluate
the Aerated Simple Mix (ASM) process proposed by Stauffer Management Company
(SMC) as an alternative to the HDS process. EPA has reviewed recently
available treatability study data that indicate that the ASM process will
not produce the required dense sludges that DTSC and RWQCB agree are
necessary. EPA will review this information with the DTSC and RWQCB and
will continue to assess any subsequently developed information.

SI wouldn't let me post this complete--continued next post.

Regards,
Gary



To: Frank Brisebois who wrote (3784)6/8/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: DDS-OMS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4571
 
EPA ROD continued:


III. ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE

Heavy-metal-laden AMD is released from several, and possibly all, of the
inactive mine workings at IMM and from the numerous waste piles on the mine
property. The AMD drainage discharges to surface waters (which include
Boulder, Slickrock, and Spring Creeks, the Spring Creek Reservoir, Keswick
Reservoir, and the Sacramento River), causing severe environmental impacts
and posing a potential threat to human health. The Sacramento River is a
major fishery and source of drinking water for Redding. The National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has identified the affected
area as the most important salmon habitat in California. Under the Clean
Water Act [Para]304(1) inventory of impaired water bodies and the toxic
point sources affecting the water bodies, EPA identified the IMM site as the
largest such discharger of toxic metals in the United States.

EPA has identified control of AMD sources in the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep
Operable Unit as a major step in the ultimate control of discharges of
contamination from the IMM site. The Old/No. 8 Mine Seep is the third
largest source of AMD at the site. Actual or threatened releases of AMD
from this site, if not addressed by implementing the response action
selected in the Record of Decision (ROD), may present an imminent and
substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment.

The Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable Unit (OU) includes the AMD discharges from
the seeps which emerge from the north slope of the Slickrock Creek valley in
the vicinity of several portals of the Old Mine and No. 8 Mine. The mine
portals are covered by landslides, and the mines are not accessible.

The AMD discharged to Slickrock Creek contains high concentrations of
copper, cadmium, and zinc and is the primary exposure pathway. The
principal threat posed by these releases is the creation of conditions toxic
to aquatic life in the receiving waters, most importantly, the Sacramento
River. The Sacramento River supports a valuable fishery that includes four
species of chinook salmon, steelhead, and resident trout. The Winter-Run
Chinook Salmon has been designated as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act.

The ROD for the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable Unit (OU) is the third ROD for
the IMM site. The first ROD for the Site, signed in October 1986, provided
limited source control actions to begin lessening the AMD discharges and
provided water management capability to manage the ongoing AMD releases to
surface waters. Specific activities authorized by the 1986 ROD include a
diversion of Slickrock Creek around sulfide-bearing landslide debris,
diversion of Upper Spring Creek in the Boulder Creek drainage, and a partial
cap of Brick Flat Pit. All of these projects have been completed. The 1986
ROD also authorized the enlargement of the Spring Creek Debris Dam and the
diversion of the South Fork of Spring Creek. The enlargement of Spring
Creek Diversion Dam is currently being designed by the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation under an agreement with EPA.

The second ROD for the IMM site was signed on September 30, 1992. It
provided for an interim remedial action to treat AMD from the Richmond
portal and the Lawson portal in the Boulder Creek Operable Unit. This
action addressed the two largest sources of heavy-metal-laden AMD at the
site. The design of the AMD collection and conveyance system, the treatment
system, and the sludge disposal in Brick Flat Pit is underway.

To achieve the remedial action objectives of the Superfund action at the IMM
site, EPA expects to require a further study or studies for the sources in
the Slickrock Creek drainage not addressed in today's Record of Decision;
other sources in the Boulder Creek drainage; sediments in Spring Creek,
Spring Creek Reservoir, Keswick Reservoir, and the Sacramento River;
contaminated groundwater; and other sources of contamination. The
additional study will also assess potential water management options,
including the need to coordinate releases of acidic waters with Central
Valley Project water releases. Any further study will also consider
resource recovery and source control. EPA is currently developing a work
plan for this additional Remedial Action/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) activity,
and this study will consider achieving all Applicable, or Relevant, and
Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) for the actions.

IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY

The remedy selected in this decision document addresses the principal threat
posed by contaminant releases from sources within the Slickrock Creek
watershed at the IMM site through collecting and treating the Old/No. 8 Mine
Seep discharge.

The major components of the selected remedy include:

. Construction of necessary structures, pipelines, pumping stations,
and equalization to provide for delivery of all AMD flows from the
Old/No. 8 Mine Seep to the treatment facility.

. Treatment facilities to perform chemical
neutralization/precipitation treatment of all of the Old/No. 8
Mine Seep AMD using the lime high density sludge (HDS)/simple mix
treatment process option to meet the performance standards of 40
C.F.R. Part 440, which have been determined to be relevant and
appropriate to this application. Discharges to lower Spring
Creek, Boulder Creek, and Slickrock Creek shall comply with the
effluent limitations of 40 C.F.R. [Para][Para]440.102(a) and
440.103(a), except for the limitation on pH and total suspended
solids (TSS). Discharges to Flat Creek shall also comply with the
pH and TSS requirements of 40 C.F.R. [Para]440.102(a).

. Disposal of treatment residuals onsite in the inactive open pit
mine, Brick Flat Pit. The design of the improvements to Brick
Flat Pit to function as a disposal facility shall comply with the
requirements of the Toxic Pits Control Act and California
requirements for disposal of mining wastes.

V. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS

This interim action is protective of human health and the environment. The
selected remedy essentially eliminates the potential exposure and the
resultant threats to human health and the environment from the sources and
pathways addressed in this interim action. The Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable
Unit provides for an interim action that is not expected to be final and
does not address all of the sources of discharges from the IMM site. The
selected remedy, therefore, cannot be expected to be fully protective of
human health and the environment. Further remedial actions are required.

This interim action complies with (or waives) Federal and State ARARs for
this limited-scope action. The selected remedy is expected to comply with
most chemical-, action-, and location-specific ARARs. Because of the
environmental impacts of the sources not addressed in this ROD, EPA
anticipates that the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable Unit remedial action will
not provide for compliance with all ARARs at all times, and consequently EPA
is relying on the ARARs waiver for "interim measures" (40 C.F.R.
[Para]300.430(f)(1)(ii)(C)(1)) for remedy selection with respect to sources
in the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable Unit. The selected remedy does not
address all sources of contaminant discharges at the site and cannot provide
for compliance with the chemical-specific ARARs of the Central Valley
Regional Water Quality Control Board's Basin Plan water quality objectives
at all times or for full compliance with California Fish and Game Code
Section 5650, which prohibits discharge of contaminants "deleterious to
fish, plant life, or bird life." Accordingly, EPA is invoking the CERCLA
Section 121(d)(4)(A) waiver for "interim measures" for these ARARs.

EPA has determined that the selected remedy is cost-effective pursuant to
evaluations in accordance with Section 300.430(f)(1)(ii)(D) of the NCP. EPA
has considered the quality of the data relied upon to characterize the site
and the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep discharge. EPA has also considered the quality
of the data relied upon during the development and evaluation of potential
remedial alternatives, and the selection of the interim remedial action for
the Old/Mine 8 Mine Seep.

EPA has determined that the selected remedy represents the maximum extent to
which permanent solutions and treatment technologies can be utilized for the
interim remedial action for the Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable Unit at the IMM
site. Alternatives that might reduce or eliminate the AMD-forming reactions
have been developed and evaluated in the Boulder Creek Operable Unit. EPA
has concluded that significant additional development and evaluation of
these approaches is required, and this conclusion also applies to the
Old/No. 8 Mine Seep Operable Unit. EPA encourages the continued development
of those alternatives that could reduce or eliminate the AMD-forming
reactions for consideration in a subsequent action for the IMM site.
Treatment of the discharges will effectively eliminate the contaminant
discharges and is a component of all alternatives developed to date.
Treatment, therefore, is consistent with any anticipated subsequent actions.

Because this action does not constitute the final remedy for the IMM site,
the statutory preference for remedies employing treatment that reduces
toxicity, mobility, or volume as a principal element will be further
addressed by the final response action. Subsequent actions are planned to
fully address the threats posed by the conditions at this site. Because
this remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining onsite above
health-based levels, a review will be conducted to ensure that the remedy
continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment
within 5 years after commencement of the remedial action. Because this is
an interim action ROD, review of this site and of this remedy will be
ongoing as EPA continues to develop final remedial alternatives for the
site.

9-24-93
John C. Wise Date
Acting Regional Administrator



Remedy:



Operable Unit:
ROD ID: EPA/ROD/R09-86/011 ROD Date: 10/03/86
Contaminant: ACIDS
CADMIUM
HEAVY METALS
INORGANICS
O&M Costs: Estimated Costs:
Keys: ACIDS
ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY
CADMIUM
CAPPING
FUND BALANCING
GROUND WATER DIVERSION
HEAVY METALS
INORGANICS
MINING WASTES
O&M
SEDIMENTS
STATE CRITERIA
SURFACE WATER

Abstract:

IRON MOUNTAIN MINE (IMM) IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEASTERN FOOTHILLS
OF THE KLAMATH MOUNTAINS, APPROXIMATELY NINE MILES NORTHWEST OF THE CITY
OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA. BETWEEN THE 1860S AND 1962, IMM WAS
PERIODICALLY MINED FOR IRON, SILVER, GOLD, COPPER, ZINC. AND PYRITE.
THE MINE AREA, BELIEVED TO BE ONE OREBODY WHICH HAS BEEN SEGMENTED BY
FAULTING, IS LOCATED ON 4,400 ACRES OF PROPERTY THAT INCLUDES
UNDERGROUND WORKINGS, AN OPEN PIT MINING AREA, WASTE ROCK DUMPS, AND
TAILINGS PILES. RAINFALL, INFILTRATING INTO THE UNDERGROUND MINE
WORKINGS, MIXES WITH GROUND WATER AND THE ORE ZONE TO PRODUCE SULFURIC
ACID AND HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF ZINC, CADMIUM, AND COPPER. THE
RESULTING HEAVY METAL-LADEN ACIDIC WATERS, REFERRED TO AS ACID MINE
DRAINAGE (AMD), EVENTUALLY DISCHARGE THROUGH MINE ADITS OR GROUND WATER
SEEPAGE INTO THE SPRING CREEK WATERSHED STREAMS, SPRING CREEK RESERVOIR,
AND THE SACRAMENTO RIVER. THE PRIMARY CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN
INCLUDE; AMD, COPPER, CADMIUM, AND ZINC.
THE DESIRED REMEDIAL ACTION FOR THIS SITE WAS NOT SELECTED DUE TO
EXCESSIVE COST. INSTEAD, A FUND BALANCING WAIVER TO THE NCP WAS INVOKED
AND AN ALTERNATIVE THAT MOST CLOSELY APPROACHES ARARS WAS SELECTED. THE
ALTERNATIVE INCLUDES; CAPPING SELECTED CRACKED AND CARVED GROUND AREAS
USING A SOIL-CEMENT MIXTURE OR OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL; DIVERTING CLEAN
SURFACE WATER IN UPPER SPRING CREEK TO FLAT CREEK, DIVERTING CLEAN
SURFACE WATER IN SOUTH FORK SPRING CREEK TO ROCK CREEK, AND DIVERTING
CLEAN UPPER SLICKROCK CREEK WATER AROUND WASTE ROCK AND TAILINGS PILES;
ENLARGING SPRING CREEK DEBRIS DAM FROM ITS PRESENT CAPACITY OF 5,800
ACRE FEET TO 9,000 ACRE FEET; IMPLEMENTING PERIMETER CONTROL AS NEEDED
TO MINIMIZE DIRECT CONTACT THREAT; AND PERFORMING HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDY
AND FIELD-SCALE PILOT DEMONSTRATION TO BETTER DEFINE THE FEASIBILITY OF
UTILIZING LOW-DENSITY CELLULAR CONCRETE TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE ACID MINE
DRAINAGE FORMATION. THE ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS FOR THE FUND-BALANCED
ALTERNATIVE IS $68,100,000 WITH O&M PRESENT WORTH COSTS OF $4,100,000.


Remedy:

- CAP SELECTED CRACKED AND CAVED GROUND AREAS ON IRON MOUNTAIN
ABOVE THE RICHMOND ORE BODY USING A SOIL-CEMENT MIXTURE OR
OTHER SUITABLE MATERIAL *;
- DIVERT CLEAN SURFACE WATER IN UPPER SPRING CREEK TO FLAT
CREEK, DIVERT CLEAN SURFACE WATER IN SOUTH FORK SPRING
CREEK TO ROCK CREEK, AND DIVERT CLEAN UPPER SLICKROCK CREEK
WATER AROUND WASTE ROCK AND TAILINGS PILES;
- ENLARGE SPRING CREEK DEBRIS DAM (SCDD) FROM ITS PRESENT
CAPACITY OF 5,800 ACRE FEET TO 9,000 ACRE FEET;
- IMPLEMENT PERIMETER CONTROL AS NEEDED TO MINIMIZE DIRECT
CONTACT THREAT; AND
- PERFORM HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDY AND FIELD-SCALE PILOT DEMONSTRATION
TO BETTER DEFINE THE FEASIBILITY OF UTILIZING LOW-DENSITY
CELLULAR CONCRETE TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE ACID MINE DRAINAGE
FORMATION.
* (BASED ON THE PRESENT RECORD, I BELIEVE THAT CONSTRUCTION
OF A PARTIAL CAP OVER THE RICHMOND ORE BODY IS A NECESSARY SOURCE
CONTROL COMPONENT OF THE OVERALL REMEDY AS ENVISIONED BY EPA.
HOWEVER, THE POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES ARE PROPOSING TO
IMPLEMENT A SOLUTION MINING OPERATION THAT MAY BE ABLE TO
EFFECTIVELY EXPLOIT THE ORE BODY AS A RESOURCE
AND CONTROL THE
DISCHARGE OF ACID MINE DRAINAGE FROM THE MOUNTAIN. CONSTRUCTION
OF THE PARTIAL CAP COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SOLUTION MINING
OPERATION. EPA INTENDS TO FURTHER EXPLORE THE IMPLEMENTATION
AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS ASSOCIATED WITH A SOLUTION MINING
OPERATION DURING THE NEXT 60 DAYS. THEREFORE, NO ACTION WILL BE
TAKEN TO IMPLEMENT THE CAPPING COMPONENT FOR A PERIOD OF AT
LEAST 60 DAYS FROM THE SIGNATURE DATE ON THIS RECORD OF DECISION.
TO THE EXTENT THAT NEW INFORMATION CAUSES EPA TO MODIFY ITS
PRESENT OPINION THAT THE MOUNTAIN SHOULD BE PARTIALLY CAPPED,
EPA WOULD PROVIDE TO THE PUBLIC AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT PRIOR
TO MAKING ANY FINAL DECISION. I WILL MAKE A DECISION REGARDING
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAPPING COMPONENT AFTER THE 60-DAY
PERIOD HAS ENDED.).


It's my understanding that the mining solution is the solution that is currently blessed by the EPA.

Regards,
Gary