Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kent C. who wrote (1275)	6/9/1998 7:34:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1829

Kent, One more little question. What was the frequency for that particular response (86/4) and what was the HLEM system the MM I-(?). Thanks 1King

To: Kent C. who wrote (1275)	6/10/1998 8:16:00 AM
From: 1king	Respond to of 1829

Kent, Just A couple of notes. I assume these samples form a suite from the hole M1. Drilled to 49xx ft to test an MT conductor. Well, I have plotted the pet analysis and they form a nice litho-log for that particular hole. Top is Gabbro grading into gabbro/anorth into anorth cut by granite at 900m and 1360m. Each one of these contacts is a potential MT conductor. Not to mention the mineralized zone in the top of the hole around 500m. The geophysical/geological interp here is pretty self explanatory. I would not be too worried about an MT conductor as I think you have drilled it. The off-hole is something to think more about but the answer may lie in the data itself. Very interesting assays for that mineralized zone. PM's are getting up there, have you guys come up with a story for that? Regards 1King