SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (57520)6/8/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,
RE: "To: Tony Viola (57497 )
From: Paul Engel
Monday, Jun 8 1998 2:15PM ET
Reply # of 57539

Tony - Re: 'I said to Paul that I thought Mendocino was important to
stop the snickering, etc. going on about Celery, etc., that Intel needed a
full-strength Celeron. He agreed, although he said that the first Celeron,
@ 266 MHz and no L2 cache was ~ 10% faster than PMMX 233..."

I think Intel did themselves an injustice by putting out a product that
encouraged such snickering.

Intel's success has been due in part to excellent marketing and PR snafus
go a long way to NEGATE good marketing."

Well, well, well. Confession IS good for the soul, now isn't it?

Jim



To: Paul Engel who wrote (57520)6/10/1998 7:42:00 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul E. re: "I think Intel did themselves an injustice by putting out a product that encouraged such snickering.
Intel's success has been due in part to excellent marketing and PR snafus go a long way to NEGATE good marketing.
Paul".

I'm confused by that statement.
Did marketing develop the product spec for Celeron, or did PR?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News