Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Hull who wrote (57574)	6/8/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: Francis Chow	Respond to of 186894

Tom Dunlap video response to Thanks John.

To: John Hull who wrote (57574)	6/8/1998 11:11:00 PM
From: Jeff Fox	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

John, re: real Dunlap or "virtual"? Thanks for the URL. I watched both clips. On the FTC clip I was struck that the primary effect is that the FTC & DOJ are getting quite a "forced" education about technology. This effort promises to bring them kicking and screaming into the modern era. It was obvious that these guys are having to actually learn something about PC's and operating systems. This is good! As for the case, it's VERY strange and takes considerable imagination to see how antitrust law applies to the facts of these squabbles. The second more important point - this action seems to be inconsequential. The potential remedy will have about zero impact on Intel or its customers. The "victim" will be the law, as it will be mauled in meaning by the decision. Now - about the Dunlap clip. Geez - the guy was as stiff as Al Gore! Was this the real Dunlap or a virtual Dunlap model generated by a new Pentium 400? Myself I couldn't tell one way or the other :) Jeff