Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ICVI (now MTEI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (10070)	6/9/1998 9:11:00 AM
From: Mr. Forthright	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11850

<<Now, suppose that the company pays the new land in cash. Then, we have a company that is worth a lot more with the same amount of outstanding share>> You are wrong. If you buy something that is worth $1.00 for $1.00 in cash the value of the company hasn't changed.

To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (10070)	6/9/1998 9:15:00 AM
From: Mr. Forthright	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11850

<<It is worth $2.85 per share>> Says who? Could you please explain to me why anybody would sell an asset worth $200 million for restricted share worth $40,5 million at the time of the sale? 50 million shares issued when the stock was $0.81 equals $40,5 million. Why not receive the claimed value of the assets? The funny thing though is that the company turns around and claims the asset per share number is $2.85. I don't get it, one day the sellers receive $40,5 million for the assets and the next they publicly claim they are worth more than $200 million. I am confused.