Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Windows on Wall Street -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Adams who wrote (1321)	6/9/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: peter n matzke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2233

Hi Ken, i use QP to scan and then analyze in WOW. QP is very fast. The index problem is only on the Dow. SPX and other indexes are accurate based on a little comparison that i did. QP 1.0 offers stock and index data QP 2.0 offers stock, index, and mutual fund data neither version offers options, futures, commodities etc. regards, peter

To: Ken Adams who wrote (1321)	6/9/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: TechTrader42	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2233

"Anybody doing this now?" you ask. Lots of us. I scan with QP2 and then flip through the charts in WOW or Metastock. To give you an idea of what we're doing with scans, you can have a look at my QP2 scan site, which has a few scans done by me and lots more written by many others. The scans are complex in some cases, but we've been testing our creativity. Most scans are fairly easy to write. geocities.com As for the indexes, the "problem" seems to be nothing more (or nothing less, I suppose) than how the high, low and close are calculated for the Dow. No stone is left unturned in our search for bugs, huh? Brooke