Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CIMA who wrote (4632)	6/9/1998 11:15:00 AM
From: Probart	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Just to let you know I am buying more at these levels, that last couple of buys were MINE! Been in this for a year and feeling very very good about it. This thing is either going to be huge or it is going to be nothing - no ifs or buts.

To: CIMA who wrote (4632)	6/9/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: Michel Grenier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Just read the entire 1991 geological report. There is a wealth of information there. That, plus the 1997 report, may explain why reserves can be proven with the kind of sampling conducted recently. Contrary to what some people have been saying, that "there is no way you can prove 6.4M ounces with that kind of sampling", I believe that in view of the existing geological information, it is quite possible that the whole thing makes sense.