Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GMD RESOURCE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Kaiser who wrote (742)	6/9/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1030

Hello Rich To raise interest in the legitimacy of this play again, may I suggest that you attempt to post the data from the various categories I have outlined recently as it becomes available. By discussing this with others who's experience allows them to appreciate the validity of your data, legitimacy, anticipation and focus will slowly be directed at GMD again. The odd news letter writer, possibly the Hard Rock Analyst, that actually knows what they are talking about, and are not just basing their recommendations on some promotional scheme, might also appreciate the facts. Regards

To: Rich Kaiser who wrote (742)	6/10/1998 10:24:00 AM
From: Trevor R. Teed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1030

Hi Rich: The airborne should establish anomalies, some will exhibit positive(high) magnetic signatures and others will carry negative(low) magnetic signatures. The anomalies will be ground proofed with purpose of eliminating each anomaly as a drill target. An attempt will be made to explain each anomaly prior to a drill program. Some highs will likely be explained as diabase dykes. These dykes are common within the Royce Group and prospectors can often determine the anomaly source to be diabase. This would save GMD cash because there would be no need to drill a diabase created anomaly. Some lows and other highs will require other means to eliminate the anomalies as targets. There will be need for till sampling and in some cases, lake bottom sampling. Often a follow-up run of ground MAG/VLF could help eliminate the anomaly by establishing non pipe like geophysical attributes. There is a positive side to diabase dykes, these dykes are often associated with kimberlites. However, not all kimberlites carry a recognizable geophysical signature. Therefore, the till and lake bottom sampling programs are also used to identify targets which the geophysics can not identify. Hence, the regional diabase dykes are a good sign. GMD has previously identified many anomalies and the current airborne program will enhance targets discovered by the various till sampling programs. The ground proofing will follow the airborne. The till sampling programs have all been positive, that is why there is a followup airborne program. I believe there are kimberlites on the Royce. I have spent several years trying to prove such and I believe GMD is just months away from establishing my belief as a truth. Don Farrell is responsible for bring the Royce program to where it is today. GMD would never have had the Royce without Don. All the GMD data and the up coming drill program are the results of Don Farrell's envolvement and of his belief in the properties. The positives Don Farrell created are still the driving force behind the exploration of the Royce and he should be allocated the credit he is due for this program. Hang in there folks. Trevor