Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s. bateh who wrote (55789)	6/9/1998 1:42:00 PM
From: Todd N	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

Did anybody else just get blacked out of SI for a while? I couldn't get a connection for quite a while. Todd

To: s. bateh who wrote (55789)	6/9/1998 1:54:00 PM
From: CASEY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

I spoke to a friend who works for IOM and she told me they are not making a dime on these ZIPS. The street must now this too... seems to support the non event impact on the stock. IOM must be do whatever to generate more ZIPS in the market.

To: s. bateh who wrote (55789)	6/9/1998 2:14:00 PM
From: BBG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

>>>its going to be huge!!!<<< S. Bateh... I know I shouldn't but I just can't stand it any longer... When are you going to get a clue and learn that selling TON'S of product and HUGE amounts of material doesn't mean squat if you don't make money doing it. If selling TON's of stuff is what you're interested in then you may be correct, the news is "HUGE" in terms of potential units sold but if you're interested in the value of this broken stock then the news is just another HUGE DISSAPOINTMENT... Also... I think the fact that CPQ is doing a deal of any kind with SYQUEST is a big negative for IOMEGA... If IOMEGA, ZIP, ZAZ, etc... were really the standard SYJUNK would've been history by now... IMHO JD