Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SYQUEST -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert E. Bruss who wrote (6595)	6/9/1998 9:15:00 PM
From: HairBall	Respond to of 7685

I have both syquest and IOM drives. Been in graphics business more years than I care to mention. Both Syquest and IOM drive perform well. Personal Computers. PC: 1991 - Tried to purchase 88 meg syquest for PC...had to return five dives, differnt problem with each. I switched to IOM transportable 150. Good drive. Still works fine. PMac: 1994 - Purchase 88 meg syquest...no trouble todate. PC: 1/1997 - Built in IDE Zip with new puter. Works Great no problems. 7/1997 - Purchased SCSI Zip for another one of my puters...it also works great no problems. Removable drives are used extensively by the graphics industry to shuttle around images and files. They work great. Syquest originally had the market share in this industry...however, IOM with the advent of the Zip drive has taken over.