Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GameTech Int'l. GMTC < SATELLITE Bingo and more > -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shaquapa who wrote (262)	6/10/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: sigmass	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 400

Shaq I have oin several ocassions in the past suggested you distance yourself from tgs and gave you the logic behind this suggestion. If you recall I even did so via private E- Mail. Do yourself a favor and reconsider wbether or not it~s to your best interest to to evaluate who really operating on a full disclosure basis and who isn't. Some examples that are on the record that you should reveiw regarding the validity of their content are postings made by you and tgs on the following subjects: The reasons the GMTC stock price collapsed on Jan. 9 1998 The unimportance you attached to the securities violations issue Avoiding disclosure of the basis for the class action suit. Avoiding a response to the trend/charity law suits and counter suits Hyping the stock at higher prices without presenting any information that gave the investors a total and complete picture I could continue if I were to go thru my files --Which I will do soon. All the above is strictly from memory. I do hope you do not lose on your GMTC investment because as I1ve said before there is room for all. Unfortunately for everybody tgs has continued on with his game and that demands that the TOTAL INFORMATION be put forth not just the favorable material. Remember that a number of postings are simon pure and therfore are are not subject to attack. The clever mixing in of the "OTHER TYPE" is what I'm going after. It's time to blow away the smoke screen and let the chips fall where they may regarding "THE DEITY" Let me know the results of your reveiw of the above mentioned postings. I will certainly face up to critical comments any time I am shown to be off base ( AS I'm am a mere mortal I do expectec to get egg on my face every so often )