Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jetter who wrote (12177)	6/9/1998 8:50:00 PM
From: Patricia	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Nope...don't think you have a legal case here IMO: Read the first paragraph carefully everyone...the one before the list begins: "Thanks to the Stock Detective's vigilant readers and a bevy of stock promoters, we're flush with tips about stocks that most people should think twice about before investing. All them may not warrant full Stinky Stock status, although we're sure a few inevitably will come from this list. Until they reach that benchmark, Stock Detective wants to warn readers about stocks that should have you seeing "red." What sets them apart? Take your pick: volatility, high volume, wild price swings, outrageous claims, a stack of vacuous press releases, or maybe a share price that doesn't seem to add up from the sum of the company's parts." It says this info comes from "TIPS" from vigilant readers and stock promoters AND that not all of the stocks named may even deserve to be given what they call "full stinky stock status", which is basically a disclaimer...IMO. It reads simply as a "red" flag warning to new investors to do their DD before investing. Don't worry about it... Patricia

To: Jetter who wrote (12177)	6/9/1998 10:13:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

I think it's important to put into context what is actually going on with the SD. I've posted their lead paragraph for you all to see and marked what I believe are appropriate excerpts. I would love to know just WHO provides these tips. Additionally, I would like to see if they have reported on other such "volatile," "high volume," "wide price swings," "vacuous press release's," Now, relative to these specific issues, it would be interesting to see how we stack up. I would also like to have a definition of "vacous pr's." A great site to start research would be dsr.simplenet.com. I have to run a few errands and pick some people up at the airport. see if any of you might do some background. Thanks Rich Thanks to the Stock Detective's vigilant readers, (I'd like to know who they are?) and a bevy of stock promoters, we're flush with tips about stocks that most people should think twice about before investing. All them may not warrant full Stinky Stock status, although we're sure a few inevitably will come from this list. Until they reach that benchmark, Stock Detective wants to warn readers about stocks that should have you seeing "red." What sets them apart? Take your pick:<<<<<< volatility, high volume, wild price swings, outrageous claims, a stack of vacuous press releases, or maybe a share price that doesn't seem to add up from the sum of the company's parts.>>>>>>