Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. M. Jones who wrote (3906)	6/9/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

Can nobody make you happy. I'm sick of this fault finding. Since I saw that Todd e-mailed to many investors the identical thing he said to me I see it was a survey, not a request for confidential advice. I also did not receive any e-mail so I have no idea if he identified himself or not. He did not ask for anything to be confidential. Everyone else was posting there responses and I did not think about his name being there. Also his last public post on SI was December 12, 1997.

To: M. M. Jones who wrote (3906)	6/10/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4736

M.M. Bob Sturgeon posted his reply, not the e-mail to him. I think that what Bob writes is his own to decide what to do with, and it was completely correct, IMHO to post it. I mentioned here (without verbatim copying) what my response was. By the way, Bob's was not as far as mine. Bob even refrained from mentioning what he believe a "fair valuation" of NAMX is (last, if memory serves $.38 based on gas in the ground). As far as this valuation is concerned, I think we should not take it at face value, for a number of reasons, including authenticity, the need to discount gas in the ground to present value, and the fact that there are costs associated with getting the gas out. Zeev