SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1677)6/9/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: Iceberg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1894
 
>I think clearly plagiarism in an SI post should not be tolerated.

Jeff,

I agree. We were being facetious about the "plagiarism". If you consider the source of the "plagiarism", the link contained in this post...

exchange2000.com

...then you'll quickly see how nonserious all the plagiarism talk has been.

Your idea of a classic, being "something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read", seems a bit too restrictive. According to Webster's dictionary, a classic can also mean "of the highest class; most representative of the excellence of its kind". In regards to Kevin's flaming post for which he won the Kook Award, I do think his post met that criteria of being a "classic". However, in the strict literary sense of your definition, I agree - it leaves a bit to be desired. But the award wasn't meant to be for literary expertise. <g>

Ice



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1677)6/9/1998 11:19:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Respond to of 1894
 
Besides, my idea of a classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read.

So you bought "Foucault's Pendulum" as well?