Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (2651)	6/10/1998 1:30:00 AM
From: DD™	Respond to of 5736

Here, here, bravo EB (EOM). DD

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (2651)	6/10/1998 1:41:00 AM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 5736

I never said it was a fraud Eddy. It is you who are in bed with the folks that are fooling people into believing unsustainable stories about this company. I haven't told one lie on this thread, but you have told a boatload of fibs. People who are worried about their money would be well served to beware of the likes of Skipard, TokyoMex, and David Pawlak. The thing that lost people money in CCSI was greed. The same thing that lost them money in Lossicom. They believed a fanciful story, which upon closer examination, was found to be a house of cards. I am not now, and have never been a member of any "organized" shorting group as you like to claim. I am an individual investor who takes advantage of pricing inefficiencies. My forte is finding stocks that have run up to unsustainable hieghts. It is not as simple as picking a stock at random and showing up on the thread, and saying bad things. If you had a clue about how to properly value a stock, you'd admit CCSI is/was way, way, overpriced. Further, I have not made fun of one person on this thread for losing money. Perhaps I did chuckle at a few for their outlandish claims, and I most certainly get a huge belly laugh from your daily clown show. I did not cause the fall in CCSI today. You can't admit that, because then you might have to admit to yourself that you're a lousy stock picker. You know what? You're the only one who doesn't know that. Get a life Eddy. Your not going anywhere with you fantasy accusations and innuendo. Oh, please try to get back on your medication. See you on the PAIR and ACRT threads. Barb

To: Eddy Blinker who wrote (2651)	6/10/1998 1:47:00 AM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5736

Having no position in CCSI, it's going to be interesting to watch from the sidelines although I might join the fray and trade this stock. This short-long tug of war, should cause some good price swings (or so I hope), which should make it good for trading. The long-short saga is entertaining. I'm sorry that you have lost money are losing money, but that is no reason to get personal/emotional against the bears/shorts. They are pointing out some potential weaknesses with this company, just as the longs point out the potential strengths. If the company truly has the fundamentals and delivers which translates into earnings (which is a subject of debate) then the 'organized' shorting as you put it is merely a short term effect. Longs that believe in the company should thank the shorters for giving them a buying opportunity. On the other hand, Asensio has a good track record for spotting spotty companies and the current decline could be just the beginning. Asensio may have been the person to light the fuse (which would have eventually got lit) to the bomb. [ie. As the spots become more and more apparant, even longs would sell driving the price down.] Price declined faster due to Asensio's recommendation, but if it was a spotty company eventually the card house would come tumbling down. If a broker/analyst puts out a buy recommendation, some degree of weight will be placed on it [but never even if they are dead wrong, do they get any flack]. Put out a sell recommendation and you are the devil [even if you are dead right!]. Kurt