SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MINK MINERAL RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe King who wrote (482)6/11/1998 1:51:00 AM
From: Jim Andrews  Respond to of 637
 
WEll that little tid bit is a tad disturbing.TO say the least!!!!!!!I have to take responsibility for my lack of due diligence more small print that we missed certainly explains the sell off,Thanks for your candor.I was worried about dilution we can only hope Mink is current on payments as this is clearly how big fish eat little fish.Ashton was not particularly pleased with mink after loosing a lot of last years season over strike issues with the locals .I would believe this potential change in material facts would almost require a news release after discussing it openly with some shareholders and not others.Shocked Jim



To: Joe King who wrote (482)6/11/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: George S  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 637
 
Joe:
I think what Orly told you was that Ashton has to make up their minds if they want to stay with the "pipe". If they leave the pipe then Mink owns 100% and can shop for a new deal on that pipe. If they stay then Ashton will spend a few million developing the mine.

George S.



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News