Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : OILEX (OLEX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OFW who wrote (3441)	6/11/1998 12:35:00 AM
From: Steve	Respond to of 4276

But only if the contentious statements are framed in a proper context and perspective. There the law is very clear. And the test of reasonableness is a valid test of what a reasonable person might infer from such contentious statements if placed out of context of other pertinent facts. Intent to harm is also very important. Intent is proved by a pattern of behavior. Other instances of such behavior unrelated to libel in the current case are admissible to establish a pattern of behavior and a likelihood of you possessing a harmful intent at the time you wrote the contentious statements.