Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (655)	6/11/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: Greg Cummings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Goldy, This is just more of your imaginary implications. Dream on! Brent, I appreciate your message and I'll try to explain again. It's a simple fact that for this short to be covered (bought-in) the price of the stock will climb. I don't mean to imply that Fannystock will receive a penalty, but, in my attempt to make it simple, I referred to this as a penalty. To me, if I were required by regulators to buy a stock back above my short price, I would think of this as a penalty (since the "requirement" to buy back persists). Please think of it as you prefer, but, either way, they will pay more than where their average short occurred. This isn't a written law, it's just an understanding of how this stock trades and what's required of Fannystock and the other shorts. See for yourself...........currently the stock is trading at $17.25, up $1.50 for the day. IMO, this is part of the short squeeze that Fannystock is beginning to feel and the stock will likely go higher. Best of Luck, Greg