Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brady B. who wrote (8734)	6/11/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: traedin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Thats just what they need .A split more stock out there.HA HA HA!Get in early on the first drive for once.Check out AMCX.I bet it goes to $5 or $6 in the next 60 to 90 days!

To: Brady B. who wrote (8734)	6/11/1998 4:43:00 PM
From: BlueFox	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

If you read Item 5 of the 8-K you will find that Netvest was only holding the Zulu stock. Whether this was collateral or whatever ever, it says no where that the stock was signed over to Netvest. It was exchanged. A bit of a stretch there. We usually refer to shareholders "holding" stock, not "having stock signed over to them". The stock exchange was Netvest giving 12,000,000 shares of ZULU to ESVS for 220,000 shares of ESVS (both parties also exchanged some preferred shares too). We can assume Netvest must have held more ZULU shares than the ones it exchanged to ESVS, since it reportedly sold its stake in ESVS and ZULU to CIE. Now, whenever Zulu satisfies its obligations with netvest the stock will go back to zulu. I think there's some confusion here. Netvest held ZULU stock and exchanged it. With the sale to CIE, Netvest is out of the deal, and holds nothing to give back to ZULU. Otherwise why would zulu even be mentioned any further in the 8-k and be in for the split. The answer is in item 5 of the 8-K: "Netvest and certain of its limited partners may hold shares of ZULU- tek Common Stock and therefore, while each of the parties disclaim beneficial ownership of each other's interest, Netvest may be deemed to be an affiliate of ZULU-tek." BF