SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rich_1 who wrote (3545)6/11/1998 7:28:00 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6528
 
Rich: Only a few people expect anything from TVSI. "Old...New" What are you talking about. They are selling ideas that they believe people will find interesting. What have they spent and where to make any of theirs plans more than smoke. Didn't you believe in Steve Cayou?

Everyone talked to "Steve"...yea like you knew him. Go back to the beginning of this thread and you can see the blueprint for what happened here. Raabe is not new at this. Down to the dissident shareholders....it is all there.

TG



To: Rich_1 who wrote (3545)6/11/1998 7:31:00 PM
From: Kurt N  Respond to of 6528
 
For the most part what you've said is valid, but the number of shares is what is keeping the stock price at ~$.03

Couple of additional comments: Comparing the price of TVSI at $.02 vs a company that is trading at $1 or $2 or even $5+ that happens to have consecutive quarterly losses (and never made a profit in it's life) is comparing apples to oranges. Comparing the market capitalization of these 2 companies would be more reasonable.

OTC-BB stock 230 million shares @ .032 = ~$7.4 million market cap.
Nasdaq stock 7 million shares @ $1.25 = ~8.75 million market cap.

These 2 stocks would be comparable in terms of market cap, taking into account the difference between OTC-BB and Nasdaq. Although the Nasdaq market cap should/could/ought be at least twice that of an OTC-BB stock.

Maybe the market has factored in (perhaps incorrectly) that the forward looking earnings will be the same in the future as they are now and a year ago. [in other words non-existant]. On the plus side, the price will appreciate dramatically since the market didn't take them into account if there are earnings.

Kurt