Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CIMA who wrote (4857)	6/11/1998 11:11:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

I think the most logical course for us on Strodtman is to find out who he is and what his connection to GE actually is, or was. All we know so far is, "shareholder" and not a director. Is/was he an officer of the company? Did he do some work for them and was paid in shares? Until we have some answers I see no reason to panic. Also I don't think anyone has shed any light on john's question - why does the Yahoo list show the value of those shares at about .30? Jim, still in the dang office, workin' and wonderin'

To: CIMA who wrote (4857)	6/11/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: Brian N L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

CIMA is correct. 144's are an intent to sell, but if not sold in 90 days, you must re-apply. You can go on and on with this routine until your shares are deemed free trading. (I think after holding them for a year). As for officers of the company "loading up" on more shares, I'm sure they have fathoms more shares than any of us already, and did we forget this company is strapped for cash? Do you think they should sell their houses to "load up?" For the last time; 144 restricted stock can be filed for INTENT TO SELL, but does not mean they HAVe to sell. This is what I've been told by several aware folks and brokers. Ask yours. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I can accept criticism. Brian