Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dixie7777 who wrote (8750)	6/11/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

It doesn't make sense to me to short a stock while bashing it. I think that it would probably be more profitable to pick a worthless stock, and then short it while hyping it. Of course, perhaps the ideal would be to short while hyping, and then have a cohort bash while you cover.

To: Dixie7777 who wrote (8750)	6/12/1998 7:56:00 AM
From: BlueFox	Respond to of 18444

So which comes first? The Stock Detective's "expose," or the decline in the share price? Seems to me they have had a lot to do with the latter. There's no denying a stock can fall after Stock Detective lists it as stinky. Still, they do measure against a clearly laid out set of guidelines that they use to determine whether they feel a stock is stinky or not. I can't speak to whether they have under lying motives in their choice of stocks to "expose", and to me, it doesn't really matter. I don't make a decision to buy or sell based on any one source. BF