Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Natedog who wrote (8927)	6/12/1998 1:27:00 AM
From: david	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10836

hi nathan I will have tomorrow a copy of the decision, but i can tell you that:: the CSJ is honest, they took the decision they thought to be the right one, and PDG or KRY are no crooks either ,its normal business, every one defending what he thinks is his right, and defending the interest of their share holders, they both fought like tigers for their companies, but unhapilly you always have a looser and a winer that is what courts are for,to decide between litigants if they were crooks they would forge documents or stick a gun at each other,, in here there was normal litigation. no forged documents, no forged or salted samples ( brex) you can see the same between big corporations, or the state and a company (usa-microsoft)diferent situations but the same basis : defending the right of the company to make one buck more for the company and the share holders. I am sorry for the ones that lost money, there are many juniors right now in problems, dont look for a scape goat or somebody to blame, or to justify we played the game some won some lost, money is like energy it doesnt disappear it just transforms or moves some where else lets wait for tomorrow and for sure there will be a copy on the net for every one to interprete. best regards david