Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arcon Energy (MIDL Presently) The Ultimate Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Parker who wrote (3264)	6/12/1998 8:51:00 AM
From: The Devil Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Morning Don, All that is possible maybe??? But the real answer to that is who???? has a patent that been infringed on. Arcon is the leader of the pack, if anything they will be the ones doing the sueing. Best Regards WB

To: Don Parker who wrote (3264)	6/12/1998 8:52:00 AM
From: Oscar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

There's a bit of logic there, Dan, but if you extend it very far it seems to say: be careful never to buy a small company with a big product potential. Not trying to flame you, but go back 10 years or so, and think of a $2 stock that had a lot of potential, but would prolly be in for all kinds of legal challenges. Yet somehow Gates and his group have survived. Oscar

To: Don Parker who wrote (3264)	6/12/1998 9:18:00 AM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Well ... LOL been waiting on this one to crop up ... the so called ex officers and/or affiliates are no problem ... LOL .. let them take the stand and tell how it works or even simply what it is ... Let them tell the courts how they invented or designed the information in the patent. Where is all the money that was supposed to be raised to do the development? LOL ... that will be a hoot. As far as someone with deep pockets they have to have that is the same with any unfair advantage ... That is not unique ... They have done everything they know legal to prevent this from advise of caounsel. There is no guaranttee. However the legal counsel has covered every possible base and crack covered. If you know of a loop hole please let me or Arcon ... speak up. GB

To: Don Parker who wrote (3264)	6/12/1998 11:54:00 AM
From: TJG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4142

Arcon/Midalnd patent(s) ? Arcon/Midland discovered a process for producing a new fuel additive which they named DF-144. Arcon/Midland then "acquired" the world wide patents to the multiple processes which it takes to produce DF-144. I could not disclose (after extensive patent research) if anyone currently involved with Arcon/Midland was or is an original assignee of any one of the patents acquired by Arcon/Midland to produce DF-144. HOPEFULLY, Arcon/Midland has acquired and now holds ALL of the patents referencing all of the the processes which it takes to produce DF-144. The only possible way an infringement suit could be brought against Arcon/Midland would be if someone (more then likely an original assignee of a patent) proves that his/her process was used illegally (without assignment)by Arcon/Midland to produce DF-144. IMO... Arcon/Midalnd should have patents pending to protect DF-144's formula (which would be restricted information and unobtainable until a specific time period expires) and have registered DF-144 as a trademark with the federal government. I suppose you could relate this to say, the music industry. A song is published and recorder by a certain artist and a few years later someone comes out of the woodwork as says, "Hey I wrote those words when I was on a deserted island in 1958, I want compensation." I hope this helps explain what's taken place within Arcon/Midland and the patents for DF-144. I also hope that this information is accurate, LOL TJG