Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Copia who wrote (8758)	6/12/1998 8:36:00 AM
From: CWIII	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Good morning all: On a side note guys, look at the exposure ESVS/ZULU is getting (I say ESVS/ZULU because IMHO they are one in the same). Time will tell! stockadvise.com Won't be long now then all this talk about Stock Detective and Wired will be a moot point. The subject is a good topic for discussion but it is now after the fact. Look at what ESVS/ZULU is doing now and how far they have come. Now that would make a good topic of discussion! cwiii

To: Joe Copia who wrote (8758)	6/12/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Re: Stock Detective's Slam Job... The Stock Detective spokesman also did not respond to Tahoeman's request for him to show where in SD's damaging piece on Zulu was there any new information, other than that which Wired had already printed. In other words, there was no new research. It was the same damage piece rewritten and cross-referenced with Wired. In short, it was a slam job. Nothing more; nothing less. Unfortunately, a lot of innocent investors got taken to the cleaners in the process, by them--not by the company. If when this is all done and there is an investigation, it should be directed at both Wired and Stock Detective's actions, not Zulu's.