Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (484)	6/12/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Dragonfly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 880

Yawn. Where is B. Dickless Vaughn? Man of a thousand insults and not a single fact. He hasn't even been specific about what company he says contributed. I wonder why? Actually, I know why. So, which company contributed? How much? When? Inquiring minds want to know.

To: jlallen who wrote (484)	6/12/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 880

jlallen, I hate to be so redundant, but with DF it takes a while before he gets it. No matter how wrong he is proved, he will never admit it. When will he answer the vote question? The vote totals are the vote totals and he still defends his position on this. Now he's talking about the vagueries of the English language. He is incapable of admitting fault. When will he answer the donor question? When I asked him 4 days ago if he knew of non-donors that were granted waivers by Clinton, his reply should have been, "No, I just assumed." Case closed. Instead, his character flaw has escalated this into a manhood debate. He wants to bait me into going into the scrap heap of sexual insults with him, but so far I've resisted.