SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (57849)6/12/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: Gary G. Withrow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,
Re: windows upgrade

Gee Paul, like you I resisted the win95 upgrade for a long time. I was going to upgrade when it first came out, but when I heard of all the problems I just held off. I use it at work of course, but only did upgrade my home system last week. No choice, it came on my new PII. I think I'll wait on 98 until at least the first bug fix release comes out.

Gary



To: Paul Engel who wrote (57849)6/12/1998 4:05:00 PM
From: Mo Chips  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
<<Windows 95 generally runs at least a week - or sometimes two - between problems>>

And you consider this good? That means anywhere from 26 to 52 times a year you are not productive with your computer. If we assume 1 hr. per event and conservatively $50/hr to fix this costs you and every windows pc user $1,300 to $2,600 a year to maintain your PC. And to think you only paid $95 for this privilege. Another reason for the DOJ to require the OS to be free.

Mo



To: Paul Engel who wrote (57849)6/12/1998 5:07:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, Re: "Moreover, with WIndows 95, you can generally "END"
a task that crashes without having to re-boot the system."

Pretty well written article on reasons why PC's crash. I'm sure the reasons for most of our crashes are described in it.

byte.com

Tony