Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (47958)	6/12/1998 7:52:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

I guess the nay I was talking with opened his mouth way to soon. I wonder if he has been talking with a certain known and admitted short seller and is conspiring with him? Interesting turn of events. I wonder why this person ran away after my last post? see everyone later this weekend.. Riley G

To: Riley G who wrote (47958)	6/12/1998 7:56:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Riley: Here is an interesting statistic: SI has 4.7 million posts. RMIL + OVIS and various other threads affiliated with them, have 63,000 + posts by themselves. This company has accounted for 1 1/2 % of the total posts on SI. Now we can look forward to the nays posting an equal amount of posts "explaining" how they didn't do anything wrong. Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeze, I don't know if I can take that much whinning. Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong SEC!

To: Riley G who wrote (47958)	6/12/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Then why hasn't the company issued a press release dispelling the various rumours and innuendoes flying about?? In fact, why haven't we heard ANYTHING from RMIL since the last 8K filing?? It would be a very simple matter for the company to issue a news release reference the break down and delay of the RMIL/RMCW merger talks, as well as providing an update as to their current status. Then file an 8K along with it and make it an official SEC filing. RMIL shareholders deserve better than to be fed BS from the RMIL "sock puppets". You see I don't really care what the TA says. I care what is legally binding and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on penalty of fine or imprisonment. There is a big difference between hearsay and legally binding evidence. RMIL shareholders can't sue the TA as he only knows what the company tells him. But it comes down to this. If this company is still "alive" and viable, then there should be news released based on material facts that have been stated by yourself (RMIL/RMCW... etc.) As for your deposition, you stated on the TVSI thread, in your response to the SEC subpoena, that you would not be able to attend a deposition due to your planned traveling schedule this summer. Just wanted to know when you planned to talk since you may be holding up the resolution of this investigation with your delay. And you need an attorney who specializes in these issues. You don't know what you're up against. But that is just my opinion and like all of my others, you can take it or leave it. Regards, Ron

To: Riley G who wrote (47958)	6/13/1998 7:34:00 AM
From: tonto	Respond to of 55532

Guess you better learn to investigate things a little better Riley, care to share your investigation again that determined the outstanding fundamental prospects and share valuation that you use to hype about? How did you ever come up with those statements if you had done any investigation as you posted?