SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kurt N who wrote (47974)6/12/1998 9:10:00 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 55532
 
Give some credence to good rational thinking. Why would anyone invest in a worthless shell. TVSI would be better. At least after bankruptcy they are less sheltered.

TG



To: Kurt N who wrote (47974)6/12/1998 9:31:00 PM
From: TopCat  Respond to of 55532
 
Kurt,

Good post.

>>>It would be a very simple matter for the company to do this. Communicating with the shareholders in some written manner would go a long ways to instilling a small portion of investor confidence that has almost completely eroded due to the halt.<<<

This is so fundamental to what is going on here. The COMPANY has not provided any information for several months. WHY?

Without any information coming directly from the company there is no reason to believe anything else that gets posted about the company on this thread. Several people keep trying to make something out of RMIL.....but until RMIL (or whatever they want to call it now) publically and officially posts something.....it is nothing but hearsay.

How anyone (he included) can believe anything about the company from Pugs or Riley, until something comes out from the company, is beyond me.

I'm not here to trash this company......(for the sake of several innocent shareholders, I hope something can be made of this)......only to see that it is held responsible for this situation as any company should be and that those who act as "representatives" of the company also be held responsible.

TC



To: Kurt N who wrote (47974)6/12/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 55532
 
Thank you Kurt!!

That is my entire point.

Regards,

Ron