To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (474 ) 6/24/1998 9:35:00 AM From: Chuca Marsh Respond to of 1044
In response to the last post at 8:40 AM: Click on the PR last month it is NOT at Apache Location but at two others: <<..Fri 12 Jun 98 News Release Mr. James Briscoe reports Phase 1 drilling has been completed by Cyprus Metals and its affiliates at two Jaba properties in two separate joint ventures. Eight reverse circulation holes have been completed at Mammoth Wash in the Silver Bell district of Arizona, and seven have been bottomed at Opata, near Cumpas, Sonora, Mexico...>> Now, since they have a few JVs in the works, I thought it best to relate the locations with the PRs....Apachee is in the Swiss Helm Mountains of Arizona and is THOUGHT to be "Carlin Style Broad Mineralization" with all the outcrop indications. Carlin Style is what I am also seeking, the invisible gold of Nevada which was one that old Hot Link last summer I posted the Front Section Article in USA Today in July 1997. This is the play...MICROFINE mineralizations takes time and effort to identify the targets. I found one target of 0.03 OPT AU- Lead Fire Assay Gold and .25ish OPT AG- Lead Fire Assay Silver at a place with the same rock that milled out at a different location some few miles or even few thousand feet away, I can NOT talk in specifics. That location on my Carlin Style Mineralization is called Rabbitfoot. It simply means that the Grams at the inspected location were not hot, YET- The MAJIC number is really 1-2 Grams per Ton....say that there are 31 Grams to an Ounce ( so my 0.03 OPT AU converts to 0.0009677 Grams) so that re converts to with decimal point corrections as I am weird that way with my old fashioned calculcator to ONE ( 1 ) Gram Per Ton- THE majic Number) Thus, Jaba is DOWN PLAYING and NOT hyping their finds...KEEP the Faith , Baby! We HIT PAY DIRT for a Bulk Tonnage Situation!!! Now look at my assays( From Many TENS of Miles Away hell, way-closer to Nevada than Mexico) of which ONLY a couple are LEAD( Standard Fire Assay-SFA) FIRE assay...AU and AG...the hell with my NEWTECH DC Plasma if you want to discount them..hell that is the reason we made the website for our Claim Group! All assays are Rabbitfoot and we ghave not posted the WR and 109 assays even tho I like the numbers and the above 1 OPT AU gold non Register Lab Cover Letter for free milling (95%) gold from DCRS of AZ. at WR while we got almost economic gold at 109 with a Jacobs Lab in Tucson the day I visited Jaba last month at Registered Seal basis at 0.014 OPT Lead Fire Assay Gold at our 109 Claim. Now convert that to ( remember these are SELECTIVE SAMPLING Basis as our CG wsimply wants to see IF SOURCE ROCKS and SHOWINGS are on our Leased Lands) so 0.014 X 31 =0.434 or decimal round off ( up - basis ) to about 0.50 GRAM per ton HALF a GRAM per TON...and I am bragging about ...half a gram per ton? Yes...half the Majic Number of 1 Gram is alot better than ...say 10% of a Majic Number- I have about 15 of those from Wickenberg area last year!( Not on our website! Exactly 0.005-7 OPT Gold Lead Fire Assay!) around 0.18 % of 1 Gram I am NOT including them on the website. So Jaba's 1-2 grams per ton is...well..YOU say it after your read about my assays: <<.. thewww.com > > Assay's > thewww.com > thewww.com > thewww.com > thewww.com > thewww.com > thewww.com > > It should be noted that the majority of the assays performed were done by > DC-Plasma that show current hot spots as high as 0.9 and 0.7 oz per ton. > A standard fire assay was performed in assay #7 which does show free milling > gold and silver on the property at potentially economic levels. The samples > that we have taken to date are surface samples which would suggest that over burden may also be minimal. A miner who is affiliated with this group who is a P.E in the Great Southwest has examined samples that were sent to him and has found malleable gold which was removed from a rock using tweezers and an > exacto knife and cut and smashed. > The surface samples that we have assayed to date were taken a substantial > distance apart from eachother and are placer in nature. Due to the large area > between samples we believe that it will allow for the necassary tonnage > required to build a mine on these sites...>> Chuca ( and that was done on rock from the 0.03 OPT AU ( ONE GRAM) area that we claimed! RF!!! ! Cut - Smashed and Exactoed, I luv it! Again, yes it was SECTECIVLY SAMPLED ( Understand what that means - I picked to good stuff to assay to show us that it is there and some assay are infact random) and may not be representative of but a small Percentage of the tonnages- That is why JVs are set up to DRILL!!! ..and Bulk Sample and Test and RETEST!!) Proving out is a PROCESS!!! !