Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 246810 who wrote (701)	6/13/1998 1:44:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

Counts by Two, could you please introduce me to the Bre-X Auric Goldfinger? I would love to see these posts as I must have amnesia. The AOL poster must be thinking of my cousin, Englehard. In prior posts, I have compared this AENG to Bre-X as well as Solv-Ex. While I cannot say that I was short Bre-X, I can also say that I was definitely not long it nor was I promoting it. On the other hand, I can say I was short Solv-Ex and that I was a part of its downfall. Please provide any Bre-X posts that are being confused with the true Ag. Thnx.

To: 246810 who wrote (701)	6/13/1998 2:52:00 AM
From: wonk	Respond to of 3383

246810: The post from AOL was interesting. In particular: 2. Kevin Travis of Patterson-Travis (the brokerage house handling AENG's offering) has assured me that there are patents - US patents - on the engine. I have yet to see a number for them. They may exist, but I can't find them. That was on May 28th. Well a lot of other people can't find them either as of this week. I have no idea whether Kevin Travis made the above statement. However, Mr. Teague's "letter" alluded to US patents. Greg just re-iterated today there are patents. When he started the thread he said there were US patents. General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 10b-5. Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Devices. It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange, a. To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, b. To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or c. To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. law.uc.edu originally posted at exchange2000.com ww